Canon R5 C vs Hasselblad X1D
57 Imaging
81 Features
89 Overall
84
![Canon EOS R5 C front Canon EOS R5 C front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Canon-EOS-R5-C/Canon-R5-C-front.jpg)
![Hasselblad X1D front Hasselblad X1D front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Hasselblad-X1D/Hasselblad-X1D-front.jpg)
60 Imaging
82 Features
74 Overall
78
Canon R5 C vs Hasselblad X1D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 45MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.20" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Expand to 102400)
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 8192 x 4320 video
- Canon RF Mount
- 770g - 142 x 101 x 111mm
- Revealed January 2022
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Introduced June 2016
- Later Model is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Canon R5 C vs Hasselblad X1D Overview
Below is a extended assessment of the Canon R5 C versus Hasselblad X1D, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by rivals Canon and Hasselblad. The image resolution of the R5 C (45MP) and the X1D (51MP) is fairly close but the R5 C (Full frame) and X1D (Medium format) enjoy totally different sensor size.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The R5 C was brought out 5 years later than the X1D and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Canon R5 C being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Hasselblad X1D being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the R5 C scores versus the X1D with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Canon R5 C vs Hasselblad X1D Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon EOS R5 C and Hasselblad X1D. The entire galleries are available at Canon R5 C Gallery and Hasselblad X1D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon R5 C over the Hasselblad X1D
R5 C | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2022 | ![]() | June 2016 | More recent by 68 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display sizing | 3.20" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Display resolution | 2100k | ![]() | 920k | Crisper display (+1180k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Canon R5 C
X1D | R5 C |
---|
Common features in the Canon R5 C and Hasselblad X1D
R5 C | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Canon R5 C vs Hasselblad X1D Physical Comparison
In case you're going to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and proportions. The Canon R5 C has got outer measurements of 142mm x 101mm x 111mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 4.4") and a weight of 770 grams (1.70 lbs) whilst the Hasselblad X1D has measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") and a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs).
See the Canon R5 C versus Hasselblad X1D in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are using at the time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the R5 C vs the X1D.
![Canon R5 C vs Hasselblad X1D size comparison Canon R5 C vs Hasselblad X1D size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-EOS-R5-C-vs-Hasselblad-X1D-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the R5 C and X1D is 57 and 60 respectively.
![Canon R5 C vs Hasselblad X1D top view buttons comparison Canon R5 C vs Hasselblad X1D top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-EOS-R5-C-vs-Hasselblad-X1D-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Canon R5 C vs Hasselblad X1D Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to envision the gap in sensor measurements purely by looking through specs. The visual underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the R5 C and X1D.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The R5 C because of its smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field trickier and the Hasselblad X1D will result in extra detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The fresher R5 C will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
![Canon R5 C vs Hasselblad X1D sensor size comparison Canon R5 C vs Hasselblad X1D sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Canon-EOS-R5-C-vs-Hasselblad-X1D-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Canon R5 C vs Hasselblad X1D Screen and ViewFinder
![Canon R5 C vs Hasselblad X1D Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon R5 C vs Hasselblad X1D Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-EOS-R5-C-vs-Hasselblad-X1D-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Canon R5 C vs Hasselblad X1D Specifications
Canon EOS R5 C | Hasselblad X1D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Hasselblad |
Model type | Canon EOS R5 C | Hasselblad X1D |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2022-01-19 | 2016-06-22 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Medium format |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 44 x 33mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 45MP | 51MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 8192 x 5464 | 8272 x 6200 |
Highest native ISO | 51200 | 25600 |
Highest boosted ISO | 102400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 50 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 1053 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Canon RF | Hasselblad X |
Total lenses | 30 | 4 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 0.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3.20" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 2,100k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760k dot | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.76x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 12.0 frames per sec | 2.3 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash options | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/2000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 8192 x 4320 @ 30p / 540 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM8192 x 4320 @ 24p / 540 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM8192 x 4320 @ 23.98p / 540 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM8192 x 4320 @ 30p / 400 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM8192 x 4320 @ 24p / 400 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM8192 x 4320 @ 23.98p / 400 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM7680 x 4320 @ 30p / 540 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM7680 x 4320 @ 24p / 540 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM7680 x 4320 @ 23.98p / 540 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM7680 x 4320 @ 30p / 400 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM7680 x 4320 @ 24p / 400 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM7680 x 4320 @ 23.98p / 400 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 60p / 810 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 60p / 260 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 410 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 410 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 410 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 160 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 160 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 160 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 810 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 260 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 410 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 410 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 410 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 160 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 160 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 160 Mbps, XF-AVC, MXF, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 60p / 225 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 60p / 170 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 60p / 150 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 135 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 135 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 135 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 150 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 150 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 150 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 225 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 170 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 150 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 135 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 135 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 135 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 150 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 150 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 150 Mbps, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (25p) |
Highest video resolution | 8192x4320 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, XF-AVC, H.264, H.265 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 770 grams (1.70 lb) | 725 grams (1.60 lb) |
Dimensions | 142 x 101 x 111mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 4.4") | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 102 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 26.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 14.8 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 4489 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LP-E6NH | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | CFexpress B and SD (UHS-II) slots | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Storage slots | 2 | 2 |
Launch cost | $4,499 | $6,495 |