Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X1D
59 Imaging
80 Features
90 Overall
84
60 Imaging
82 Features
74 Overall
78
Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X1D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 45MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Bump to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 8192 x 4320 video
- Canon RF Mount
- 738g - 138 x 98 x 88mm
- Launched July 2020
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Announced June 2016
- Later Model is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X1D Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Canon R5 and Hasselblad X1D, both Pro Mirrorless cameras by rivals Canon and Hasselblad. The resolution of the R5 (45MP) and the X1D (51MP) is very close but the R5 (Full frame) and X1D (Medium format) feature totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe R5 was released 4 years later than the X1D and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Canon R5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Hasselblad X1D being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the R5 grades versus the X1D in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X1D Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon EOS R5 and Hasselblad X1D. The complete galleries are provided at Canon R5 Gallery and Hasselblad X1D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon R5 over the Hasselblad X1D
R5 | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | July 2020 | June 2016 | More recent by 50 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display sizing | 3.2" | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
Display resolution | 2100k | 920k | Clearer display (+1180k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D over the Canon R5
X1D | R5 |
---|
Common features in the Canon R5 and Hasselblad X1D
R5 | X1D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X1D Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon R5 has got external dimensions of 138mm x 98mm x 88mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 3.5") and a weight of 738 grams (1.63 lbs) and the Hasselblad X1D has measurements of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs).
Contrast the Canon R5 and Hasselblad X1D in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the R5 versus the X1D.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the R5 and X1D is 59 and 60 respectively.
Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X1D Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to see the gap in sensor measurements merely by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic below will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the R5 and X1D.
Clearly, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The R5 featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Hasselblad X1D will provide you with more detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos far more aggressively. The more recent R5 is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X1D Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X1D Specifications
Canon EOS R5 | Hasselblad X1D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Hasselblad |
Model | Canon EOS R5 | Hasselblad X1D |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Launched | 2020-07-09 | 2016-06-22 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Digic X | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Medium format |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 44 x 33mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 45MP | 51MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 8192 x 5464 | 8272 x 6200 |
Maximum native ISO | 51200 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 102400 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 50 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 1053 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Canon RF | Hasselblad X |
Number of lenses | 17 | 4 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 0.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3.2" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 2,100 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.76x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 12.0fps | 2.3fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/2000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 8192x4320 (30p/24/23.98p) 7680x4320 (30p/23.98p) |4096x2160 (120p/60p/30p/24p/23.98p) |3840x2160 (120p/60p/30p/23.98p) |1920x1080 (60p/30p/23.98p) | 1920 x 1080 (25p) |
Maximum video resolution | 8192x4320 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 738 grams (1.63 lbs) | 725 grams (1.60 lbs) |
Dimensions | 138 x 98 x 88mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 3.5") | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 102 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 26.2 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 4489 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LP-E6NH | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | CFexpress and SD (UHS-II) slots | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Storage slots | 2 | 2 |
Launch cost | $3,899 | $6,495 |