Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X2D
59 Imaging
80 Features
90 Overall
84
![Canon EOS R5 front Canon EOS R5 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Canon-EOS-R5/Canon-R5-front.jpg)
![Hasselblad X2D 100c front Hasselblad X2D 100c front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Hasselblad-X2D-100c/Hasselblad-X2D-front.jpg)
56 Imaging
93 Features
78 Overall
87
Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X2D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 45MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Push to 102400)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 8192 x 4320 video
- Canon RF Mount
- 738g - 138 x 98 x 88mm
- Introduced July 2020
(Full Review)
- 100MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Tilting Display
- ISO 64 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 895g - 149 x 106 x 75mm
- Released September 2022
- Old Model is Hasselblad X1D II 50C
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X2D Overview
Following is a complete comparison of the Canon R5 and Hasselblad X2D, both Pro Mirrorless digital cameras by manufacturers Canon and Hasselblad. There exists a significant gap between the sensor resolutions of the R5 (45MP) and X2D (100MP) and the R5 (Full frame) and X2D (Medium format) offer different sensor size.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The R5 was launched 3 years prior to the X2D which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Canon R5 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Hasselblad X2D being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the R5 grades versus the X2D in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X2D Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon EOS R5 and Hasselblad X2D 100c. The complete galleries are available at Canon R5 Gallery and Hasselblad X2D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon R5 over the Hasselblad X2D
R5 | X2D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X2D over the Canon R5
X2D | R5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2022 | ![]() | July 2020 | More modern by 26 months |
Display size | 3.60" | ![]() | 3.2" | Larger display (+0.4") |
Display resolution | 2360k | ![]() | 2100k | Clearer display (+260k dot) |
Common features in the Canon R5 and Hasselblad X2D
R5 | X2D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X2D Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera often, you should take into account its weight and size. The Canon R5 has got outer measurements of 138mm x 98mm x 88mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 738 grams (1.63 lbs) whilst the Hasselblad X2D has specifications of 149mm x 106mm x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") having a weight of 895 grams (1.97 lbs).
Check the Canon R5 and Hasselblad X2D in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that moment. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the R5 and the X2D.
![Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X2D size comparison Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X2D size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-EOS-R5-vs-Hasselblad-X2D-100c-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the R5 and X2D is 59 and 56 respectively.
![Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X2D top view buttons comparison Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X2D top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-EOS-R5-vs-Hasselblad-X2D-100c-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X2D Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading specifications. The picture here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the R5 and X2D.
Plainly, each of the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The R5 due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Hasselblad X2D will deliver more detail utilizing its extra 55 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images way more aggressively. The more aged R5 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
![Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X2D sensor size comparison Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X2D sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Canon-EOS-R5-vs-Hasselblad-X2D-100c-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X2D Screen and ViewFinder
![Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X2D Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X2D Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-EOS-R5-vs-Hasselblad-X2D-100c-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Canon R5 vs Hasselblad X2D Specifications
Canon EOS R5 | Hasselblad X2D 100c | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Hasselblad |
Model | Canon EOS R5 | Hasselblad X2D 100c |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2020-07-09 | 2022-09-07 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Digic X | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Medium format |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 44 x 33mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 45 megapixel | 100 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 4:3 |
Max resolution | 8192 x 5464 | 11656 x 8742 |
Max native ISO | 51200 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 102400 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 50 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 1053 | 294 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Canon RF | Hasselblad X |
Amount of lenses | 17 | 13 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 0.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen size | 3.2 inch | 3.60 inch |
Resolution of screen | 2,100 thousand dots | 2,360 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 5,760 thousand dots | 5,760 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.76x | 0.87x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30s | 4080s |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/4000s |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/6000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 12.0fps | 3.3fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | TTL center weighted system, compatible with Nikon System Flashes |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/4000s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 8192x4320 (30p/24/23.98p) 7680x4320 (30p/23.98p) |4096x2160 (120p/60p/30p/24p/23.98p) |3840x2160 (120p/60p/30p/23.98p) |1920x1080 (60p/30p/23.98p) | - |
Max video resolution | 8192x4320 | - |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 738g (1.63 lbs) | 895g (1.97 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 138 x 98 x 88mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 3.5") | 149 x 106 x 75mm (5.9" x 4.2" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | 420 photographs |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LP-E6NH | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | CFexpress and SD (UHS-II) slots | CFexpress Type B, 1TB Internal Storage |
Card slots | Two | One |
Launch cost | $3,899 | $8,199 |