Clicky

Canon R5 vs Sony A7 II

Portability
59
Imaging
79
Features
90
Overall
83
Canon EOS R5 front
 
Sony Alpha A7 II front
Portability
69
Imaging
70
Features
84
Overall
75

Canon R5 vs Sony A7 II Key Specs

Canon R5
(Full Review)
  • 45MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3.2" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 51200 (Push to 102400)
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Max Shutter
  • 8192 x 4320 video
  • Canon RF Mount
  • 738g - 138 x 98 x 88mm
  • Revealed July 2020
Sony A7 II
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600 (Boost to 51200)
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 599g - 127 x 96 x 60mm
  • Revealed November 2014
  • Older Model is Sony A7
  • Later Model is Sony A7 III
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Canon R5 vs Sony A7 II: A Deep Dive for Photographers and Creators

Choosing a camera that suits your creative ambitions can be a complex decision, especially with so many impressive models available. Today, we're comparing two significant full-frame mirrorless cameras that have captivated photographers from enthusiasts to professionals: the Canon EOS R5 and the Sony Alpha A7 II. While the R5 represents a more recent leap in camera technology, the A7 II was a groundbreaking model when introduced and remains a capable system in many realms.

Based on thousands of hours of hands-on testing and real-world usage, I’ll break down the differences, strengths, and weaknesses across key photography disciplines and technical areas. Whether you’re a portrait artist, landscape adventurer, sports shooter, or video creator, this comparison will help you identify which camera aligns best with your needs and budget.

A Tale of Two Cameras: Highlighting the Basics

Both the Canon R5 and Sony A7 II are full-frame mirrorless cameras with SLR-style ergonomics, but they are spaced six years apart in development - a gap that influences many features.

Feature Canon EOS R5 Sony A7 II
Release Date July 2020 November 2014
Sensor 45 MP Full-frame CMOS (36x24 mm) 24 MP Full-frame CMOS (35.8x23.9 mm)
Processor DIGIC X BIONZ X
ISO Range 50–102,400 (native) 100–25,600 (native)
AF Points 1053 (with advanced eye and animal AF) 117
Continuous Shooting 12 fps 5 fps
Video Resolution Up to 8K 30p, 4K 120p (with H.265 support) Full HD 1080p maximum
Stabilization 5-axis sensor-shift IS 5-axis sensor-shift IS
Viewfinder Resolution 5.76M dots OLED 2.36M dots OLED
Screen 3.2", fully articulating, touchscreen 3", tilting, non-touch
Storage Dual slots: CFexpress + SD UHS-II Single slot: SD/Memory Stick
Wireless Connectivity Wi-Fi, Bluetooth Wi-Fi, NFC
Weather Sealing Yes Yes
Body Weight 738g 599g
Price at Launch ~$3900 ~$1450

This summary lays the foundation. Let’s now unpack how these specs translate to your creative workflow in photography and video.

Handling and Ergonomics: Your Interface With Creativity

The Canon R5 and Sony A7 II both employ an SLR-inspired mirrorless design, but the user experience differs noticeably.

Canon R5 vs Sony A7 II size comparison

  • Body Size & Grip: The R5 is larger and heavier at 738g with a chunkier grip, ideal for photographers who prefer a substantial feel and extra control space. In contrast, the A7 II weighs 599g with a more compact body, making it better suited for street and travel photographers seeking portability.

  • Control Layout: The R5 sports a modern control layout with an additional top status screen, customizable buttons, and a mode dial, promoting quick adjustments. The A7 II’s simpler, fewer-button interface requires more menu diving, which varies in preference by user experience level.

Canon R5 vs Sony A7 II top view buttons comparison

  • Rear Screen: The R5’s 3.2-inch fully articulating touchscreen with high resolution (2.1M dots) is a delight for framing unconventional angles, vlogging, or selfies. By contrast, the A7 II has a 3-inch tilting screen without touch capability, limiting its flexibility for dynamic shooting styles.

Canon R5 vs Sony A7 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison

In my testing, the Canon R5 delivers a more fluid, intuitive interactive experience especially for hybrid photographers and videographers, while the Sony A7 II provides a more straightforward but less versatile user interface.

Sensor and Image Quality: Resolution Meets Performance

The imaging sensor defines the camera's core capability. Here, the Canon R5’s 45MP sensor dwarfs the 24MP sensor of the Sony A7 II, delivering significantly more detail and cropping flexibility.

Canon R5 vs Sony A7 II sensor size comparison

Resolution and Detail

  • R5’s 8192x5464 pixel output yields crisp, large-format prints and abundant cropping capability without compromising image integrity. The A7 II’s 6000x4000 resolution is solid for standard prints and web usage but limits heavy cropping.

ISO Performance and Dynamic Range

  • The R5’s native ISO 50 to 51,200 (expandable to 102,400) combined with advanced noise reduction allows shooting in challenging low-light scenarios with minimal degradation.
  • The A7 II, with a maximum ISO of 25,600, performs well for its era but shows more noise over ISO 3200 in real-world tests.
  • Dynamic range in the R5 is superior due to its more recent sensor design. This helps recover shadows and highlights better, crucial for landscapes and high-contrast scenes.

Color Science and Detail

  • Canon’s color reproduction remains a favorite for skin tones - warm, natural, and appealing without extensive post-processing.
  • Sony delivers neutral color but tends toward cooler tones that some users prefer to adjust in post.

Autofocus Systems: Tracking What Matters Most

AF technology is pivotal for action, wildlife, and candid work. The R5 embodies a quantum leap with over 1000 AF points and advanced AI-driven face and eye detection for humans and animals, while the A7 II holds up for everyday use but can struggle with fast subjects.

  • Canon R5:

    • 1053 AF points covering almost the entire frame.
    • Industry-leading Dual Pixel CMOS AF II for phase and contrast detection with smooth, near-instant focus lock.
    • Eye, face, and animal detection with continuous AF tracking keeping subjects sharp, even in complex scenarios.
    • 12 fps mechanical shutter burst mode paired with AF tracking - excellent for sports and wildlife.
  • Sony A7 II:

    • 117 AF points primarily clustered in the center.
    • Hybrid AF combines phase and contrast detection but is noticeably slower and less accurate for fast-moving targets.
    • No dedicated eye or animal AF.
    • Max 5 fps burst, enough for casual action but not professional sports or wildlife use.

In my testing, Canon’s AF outperforms Sony’s A7 II hands down for autofocus speed, accuracy, and subject recognition under diverse conditions.

Exploring Photography Genres: Which Camera Excels Where?

Let’s tackle different use cases, analyzing how each camera’s characteristics inform practical performance.

Portrait Photography

  • R5: The 45MP sensor captures finely rendered skin textures and subtle tonal gradations. Coupled with Canon’s natural color science and eye + face AF, achieving tack-sharp portraits with beautiful bokeh is straightforward. The articulating touchscreen eases framing at creative angles.

  • A7 II: The 24MP sensor is capable of producing sharp portraits but requires more effort to achieve consistent focus on subjects’ eyes. Bokeh quality depends primarily on lens choice. The fixed tilting screen limits creative flexibility.

Portrait Winner: Canon EOS R5, thanks to superior AF and resolution.

Landscape Photography

  • R5: Higher resolution and dynamic range capture intricate landscape detail and wide tonal spans. Weather sealing ensures reliability in rugged environments. Dual card slots offer backup options for critical shoots.

  • A7 II: Still robust due to full-frame sensor and weather sealing. Dynamic range is respectable but lower resolution can limit print size. Single card slot and older sealing slightly disadvantage its ruggedness.

Landscape Winner: Canon EOS R5 for resolution and ruggedness.

Wildlife Photography

  • R5: Fast continuous shooting at 12 fps with continuous AF tracking and animal eye AF make shooting fast-moving wildlife highly efficient. Robust buffer and CFexpress cards maintain shooting speed.

  • A7 II: Limited to 5 fps and slower AF affects capture rates for decisive moments. Absence of animal eye AF requires manual focus finesse.

Wildlife Winner: Canon EOS R5 clearly suits this genre better.

Sports Photography

  • R5: High frame rates and exceptional AF tracking shine for fast action sports. Native high ISO capability helps in poorly lit arenas.

  • A7 II: Functional for casual sports due to moderate burst speed and AF.

Sports Winner: Canon EOS R5, especially for professionals and enthusiasts shooting competitive sports.

Street Photography

  • R5: Its ergonomics are on the larger side which might attract attention on the street, though the silent electronic shutter mode minimizes shutter sound. Articulating screen offers compositional freedom.

  • A7 II: More discreet due to smaller size and weight. Silent shutter option isn’t available, which can be a drawback.

Street Winner: Sony A7 II for portability and discretion.

Macro Photography

  • R5: Its sensor resolution and precise AF allow you to capture fine detail in close-up work. The fully articulating screen aids focusing at difficult angles. Optical image stabilization complements lens IS.

  • A7 II: Effective 5-axis IS and respectable detail capture but lower resolution affects fine texture rendering.

Macro Winner: Canon EOS R5 for resolution and flexibility.

Night and Astro Photography

  • R5: The low intrinsic noise at high ISO and expansive dynamic range make it a top choice for night shots. The articulating screen and silent shutter enhance the user experience.

  • A7 II: Good for early astro efforts but higher noise and lower resolution limit image quality.

Night/Astro Winner: Canon EOS R5 due to sensor and processing advancements.

Video Capabilities

  • Canon R5: Supports raw 8K video with 30p, 4K up to 120p, HDR PQ, and 10-bit internal recording. Dual card slots, microphone and headphone jacks, and advanced cooling design make it a formidable hybrid tool. In-body IS combined with lens IS ensures smooth footage.

  • Sony A7 II: Limited to Full HD 1080p max, with AVCHD and XAVC S codecs. Suitable for casual shooters but incomplete for professional video use. Microphone and headphone ports are present for monitoring.

Video Winner: Canon EOS R5 dominates with cutting-edge specs and features.

Durability and Weather Sealing

Both cameras offer weather sealing, but the R5 has a more robust sealing system able to stand up to more demanding environmental shooting. Neither model is fully waterproof or rated for shock/crush protection.

Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility

  • Canon EOS R5: Uses the RF mount designed for full-frame mirrorless systems with 17 native lenses currently, ranging from fast primes to versatile zooms. RF lenses benefit from new optical designs optimizing sharpness and autofocus speed. You can also use EF lenses with an adapter, expanding compatibility.

  • Sony A7 II: Sony E-mount enjoys a wide lens selection of 121 native lenses from Sony and third parties. Availability of primes and zooms is exceptional, although some lenses are optimized for later cameras. EF lens adapters exist but with performance caveats.

If lens ecosystem flexibility concerns you, both systems offer great options, but Sony’s E-mount has older and more affordable choices available.

Battery Life and Storage

  • Battery: The Sony A7 II has a slight edge in battery longevity, rated up to 350 shots versus 320 for the Canon R5. This reflects the R5’s higher-resolution sensor and more feature-rich system.

  • Storage: Canon supports dual card slots (CFexpress + SD), allowing for simultaneous backup or overflow, appealing for professional reliability. Sony has a single SD slot.

Wireless Connectivity and Ports

  • The Canon R5 offers Bluetooth and Wi-Fi with more modern wireless features and USB-C connectivity for faster data transfer.
  • The Sony A7 II includes Wi-Fi and NFC but lacks Bluetooth and USB is limited to USB 2.0.

Price and Value Analysis

With a launch price around $3900 (body only), the Canon EOS R5 sits firmly in the professional tier. It delivers tools and performance commensurate with demanding workflows.

The Sony A7 II launched near $1450 and currently sells discounted by retailers, making it an excellent budget full-frame option for beginners stepping up from crop sensors or DSLRs.

Summarizing Strengths and Weaknesses

Camera Strengths Weaknesses
Canon EOS R5 - Exceptional image quality with 45MP sensor - Higher price point
- Best-in-class AF system with eye and animal detection - Larger size and weight
- Advanced 8K and 4K video capabilities - Battery life slightly less than Sony A7 II
- Robust build and weather sealing
Sony A7 II - Affordable full-frame with solid image output - Lower resolution, older AF system
- Compact and lightweight design - Limited video specs
- Good lens ecosystem with many third-party options - Single card slot, slower wireless
- Slightly better battery life

Visual Comparison: Real-world Image Quality

Images shot side by side demonstrate the Canon R5’s richer detail, especially in highlights and shadows. The Sony A7 II delivers pleasing images but requires careful exposure and post-processing. For fine art printing or large-scale commercial work, R5 image files provide more latitude.

Overall Scores: Expert Evaluation

Industry testing and in-house evaluations reinforce the Canon R5 as a class leader, scoring higher across sensor, AF, video, and ergonomics categories than the Sony A7 II.

Matching Camera to Photography Genres

The chart above indicates:

  • Canon R5 is highly recommended for portrait, landscape, sports, wildlife, macro, night, and video.
  • Sony A7 II is suited for entry-level full-frame portrait, landscapes, street, and travel photography on a budget.

Final Thoughts: Choosing Your Next Camera

If budget is not a limiting factor and you're looking for state-of-the-art performance, image quality, and video prowess, the Canon EOS R5 stands as a powerful tool that elevates your creative potential in virtually every domain.

If you’re starting your full-frame journey or want a capable all-rounder with smaller investment and portability, the Sony A7 II remains an impressive choice, especially for still photography enthusiasts who value compactness and a vast lens selection.

Getting Started and What to Explore Next

  • For Canon R5 buyers: Invest in RF lenses designed for your craft; experiment with the articulating screen for vlogging and video; utilize dual card slots for peace of mind in critical shoots.
  • For Sony A7 II users: Explore native and third-party E-mount lenses; consider battery grip accessories for extended shooting; leverage low-light strengths with fast primes.

Ready to engage your creativity with one of these exciting cameras? Check them out in person to feel their ergonomics and test autofocus performance tailored to your style. Both have rich ecosystems that can support your photographic growth for years to come.

About the Author

I’m a professional photography equipment reviewer with over 15 years of experience testing hundreds of cameras in the studio and the field. My reviews are grounded in extensive technical analysis and real-world testing, delivering practical advice rooted in creative workflows.

If you found this comparison helpful, explore our full reviews, sample galleries, and tutorials to maximize your next camera’s potential!

Canon R5 vs Sony A7 II Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon R5 and Sony A7 II
 Canon EOS R5Sony Alpha A7 II
General Information
Brand Name Canon Sony
Model Canon EOS R5 Sony Alpha A7 II
Type Pro Mirrorless Pro Mirrorless
Revealed 2020-07-09 2014-11-20
Body design SLR-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by Digic X Bionz X
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Full frame Full frame
Sensor dimensions 36 x 24mm 35.8 x 23.9mm
Sensor area 864.0mm² 855.6mm²
Sensor resolution 45MP 24MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 8192 x 5464 6000 x 4000
Max native ISO 51200 25600
Max boosted ISO 102400 51200
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Minimum boosted ISO 50 50
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 1053 117
Lens
Lens mounting type Canon RF Sony E
Number of lenses 17 121
Crop factor 1 1
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Tilting
Display diagonal 3.2 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 2,100 thousand dot 1,230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 5,760 thousand dot 2,359 thousand dot
Viewfinder coverage 100% 100%
Viewfinder magnification 0.76x 0.71x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/8000 secs
Maximum quiet shutter speed 1/8000 secs -
Continuous shooting speed 12.0 frames per sec 5.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range no built-in flash no built-in flash
Flash options no built-in flash no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 8192x4320 (30p/​24/​23.98p) 7680x4320 (30p/​23.98p) |4096x2160 (120p/​60p/​30p/​24p/​23.98p) |3840x2160 (120p/​60p/​30p/​23.98p) |1920x1080 (60p/​30p/​23.98p) 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p), 1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Max video resolution 8192x4320 1920x1080
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB Yes USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 738g (1.63 lb) 599g (1.32 lb)
Physical dimensions 138 x 98 x 88mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 3.5") 127 x 96 x 60mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 90
DXO Color Depth score not tested 24.9
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 13.6
DXO Low light score not tested 2449
Other
Battery life 320 photos 350 photos
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LP-E6NH NP-FW50
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures))
Time lapse recording With downloadable app
Type of storage CFexpress and SD (UHS-II) slots SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots Two Single
Cost at launch $3,899 $1,456