Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony H20
Portability
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Portability
87 Imaging
33 Features
29 Overall
31
87 Imaging
33 Features
29 Overall
31
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony H20 Key Specs
Olympus XZ-1
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Introduced January 2011
Sony H20
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 38-380mm (F3.5-4.4) lens
- 250g - 107 x 69 x 47mm
- Introduced May 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony H20 Overview
Lets examine more in depth at the Olympus XZ-1 versus Sony H20, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the XZ-1 (10MP) and the H20 (10MP) is pretty comparable but the XZ-1 (1/1.63") and H20 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe XZ-1 was introduced 21 months after the H20 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a full comparison, below is a concise overview of how the XZ-1 scores vs the H20 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony H20 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus XZ-1 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20. The whole galleries are available at Olympus XZ-1 Gallery & Sony H20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Sony H20
| XZ-1 | H20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2011 |  | May 2009 | More modern by 21 months |
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+384k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony H20 over the Olympus XZ-1
| H20 | XZ-1 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus XZ-1 and Sony H20
| XZ-1 | H20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony H20 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus XZ-1 enjoys physical dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs) and the Sony H20 has sizing of 107mm x 69mm x 47mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.9") and a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus XZ-1 versus Sony H20 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the XZ-1 compared to the H20.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the XZ-1 and H20 is 88 and 87 respectively.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony H20 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizes only by seeing technical specs. The pic underneath may give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the XZ-1 and H20.
As you can tell, both of the cameras have got the exact same resolution albeit not the same sensor sizes. The XZ-1 features the bigger sensor which is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult. The newer XZ-1 is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony H20 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus XZ-1 Portrait photography highlights
Sony H20 Portrait photography highlights
has manual focus
provides face detection focus
saves RAW files
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.63")
you can focus manually
external flash not possible
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Olympus XZ-1 as a Street photography camera
Sony H20 as a Street photography camera
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
no articulating screen
sensor size is tiny (1/1.63")
heavier than competition in class (275g)
image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
heavier than competition in class (250g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Sports photography with Olympus XZ-1
Sports photography with Sony H20
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking autofocus
better than average battery (320 shots)
low frames per second (2.0 frames per second)
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.63")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
image stabilization (Optical)
slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Olympus XZ-1 as a Travel photography camera
Sony H20 as a Travel photography camera
better than average battery (320 CIPA)
built-in flash
decently wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
no Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (275g)
resolution not great (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
built-in flash
great zoom (380mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition in class (250 grams)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (38mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Olympus XZ-1 Landscape photography features
Sony H20 Landscape photography features
has manual focus
decently wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW files
better than average battery (320 shots)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
resolution not great (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.63")
no Time Lapse recording
you can focus manually
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (38mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
does not have Time Lapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Olympus XZ-1 Vlogging highlights
Sony H20 Vlogging highlights
decently wide (28mm)
good max aperture (f1.8)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focus
display isn't selfie friendly
low res video (1280 x 720 pxls)
no external mic jack
heavier than competition in class (275g)
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (38mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have mic port
heavier than competition in class (250g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus XZ-1 vs Sony H20 Specifications
| Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus XZ-1 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H20 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-01-26 | 2009-05-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic V | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.63" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 8.07 x 5.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 44.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3664 x 2752 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 11 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 38-380mm (10.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/1.8-2.5 | f/3.5-4.4 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 2cm |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 614 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 8.60 m (ISO 800) | 7.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 275g (0.61 pounds) | 250g (0.55 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") | 107 x 69 x 47mm (4.2" x 2.7" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 34 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 18.8 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 10.4 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 117 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-50B | NP-BG1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $567 | $249 |