Canon R50 vs Fujifilm X-M1
75 Imaging
72 Features
88 Overall
78
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc6d1/dc6d116e2d649631b4e286f39b854d26e1ea23dc" alt="Canon EOS R50 front Canon EOS R50 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba370/ba370443c39c699b473b8a0f516b32f6134123c8" alt="Fujifilm X-M1 front Fujifilm X-M1 front"
87 Imaging
58 Features
63 Overall
60
Canon R50 vs Fujifilm X-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Increase to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon RF Mount
- 375g - 116 x 86 x 69mm
- Introduced February 2023
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 6400
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 330g - 117 x 67 x 39mm
- Released September 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Canon R50 vs Fujifilm X-M1 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Canon R50 vs Fujifilm X-M1, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by rivals Canon and FujiFilm. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the R50 (24MP) and Fujifilm X-M1 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (APS-C).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The R50 was released 9 years later than the Fujifilm X-M1 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Canon R50 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Fujifilm X-M1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the R50 grades versus the Fujifilm X-M1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Canon R50 vs Fujifilm X-M1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon EOS R50 and Fujifilm X-M1. The complete galleries are provided at Canon R50 Gallery and Fujifilm X-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon R50 over the Fujifilm X-M1
R50 | Fujifilm X-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2023 | ![]() | September 2013 | Fresher by 115 months |
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 920k | Clearer display (+120k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-M1 over the Canon R50
Fujifilm X-M1 | R50 |
---|
Common features in the Canon R50 and Fujifilm X-M1
R50 | Fujifilm X-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display dimensions | 3.00" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Canon R50 vs Fujifilm X-M1 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to consider its weight and volume. The Canon R50 comes with outer dimensions of 116mm x 86mm x 69mm (4.6" x 3.4" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 375 grams (0.83 lbs) and the Fujifilm X-M1 has sizing of 117mm x 67mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") and a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Look at the Canon R50 vs Fujifilm X-M1 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the R50 against the Fujifilm X-M1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0bb26/0bb2668960dae3fc2e6df14397724bdb8d69542b" alt="Canon R50 vs Fujifilm X-M1 size comparison Canon R50 vs Fujifilm X-M1 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the R50 and Fujifilm X-M1 is 75 and 87 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71803/71803f8366db93263323b5121a43da57e9329423" alt="Canon R50 vs Fujifilm X-M1 top view buttons comparison Canon R50 vs Fujifilm X-M1 top view buttons comparison"
Canon R50 vs Fujifilm X-M1 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing just by looking at specs. The photograph below might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the R50 and Fujifilm X-M1.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should expect to see the Canon R50 to give you greater detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more modern R50 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fbd2c/fbd2cbb905b2268c70fcd4e9273f0c507347a7a4" alt="Canon R50 vs Fujifilm X-M1 sensor size comparison Canon R50 vs Fujifilm X-M1 sensor size comparison"
Canon R50 vs Fujifilm X-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09fb2/09fb2309e510951cf4e3d887358150650b55c258" alt="Canon R50 vs Fujifilm X-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon R50 vs Fujifilm X-M1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Canon R50 vs Fujifilm X-M1 Specifications
Canon EOS R50 | Fujifilm X-M1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model type | Canon EOS R50 | Fujifilm X-M1 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2023-02-08 | 2013-09-17 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | EXR Processor II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS X-TRANS I |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 23.6 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 332.3mm² | 368.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4896 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 32000 | 6400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 651 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Canon RF | Fujifilm X |
Amount of lenses | 37 | 54 |
Crop factor | 1.6 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Tilting |
Screen size | 3.00" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.59x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/8000s | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 12.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 6m at ISO 100 | 7.00 m (ISO200m) |
Flash modes | - | Auto / Forced Flash / Suppressed Flash / Slow Synchro / Rear-curtain Synchro / Commander |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/200s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 230 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 470 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 70 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 30 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 12 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 90 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 170 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 170 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 85 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 85 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 230 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 470 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 70 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 30 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 30 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 12 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 12 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 90 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC | 1920 x 1080 30p, Continuous recording: up to approx. 14 min./1280 x 720 30p, Continuous recording: up to approx. 27 min. |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 375 gr (0.83 pounds) | 330 gr (0.73 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 116 x 86 x 69mm (4.6" x 3.4" x 2.7") | 117 x 67 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 370 shots | 350 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LP-E17 | NP-W126 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (10 sec. / 2 sec.) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | Single UHS-II SD card slot | SD memory card / SDHC memory card / SDXC (UHS-I) memory card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $679 | $399 |