Clicky

Canon R50 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C

Portability
75
Imaging
71
Features
88
Overall
77
Canon EOS R50 front
 
Hasselblad X1D II 50C front
Portability
60
Imaging
84
Features
74
Overall
80

Canon R50 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Key Specs

Canon R50
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 32000 (Raise to 51200)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Canon RF Mount
  • 375g - 116 x 86 x 69mm
  • Announced February 2023
Hasselblad X1D II 50C
(Full Review)
  • 51MP - Medium format Sensor
  • 3.60" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 2720 x 1530 video
  • Hasselblad X Mount
  • 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
  • Announced June 2019
  • Succeeded the Hasselblad X1D
  • Successor is Hasselblad X2D
Photography Glossary

Canon R50 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Overview

The following is a complete overview of the Canon R50 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by companies Canon and Hasselblad. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the R50 (24MP) and X1D II 50C (51MP) and the R50 (APS-C) and X1D II 50C (Medium format) feature different sensor sizing.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The R50 was released 3 years after the X1D II 50C which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Canon R50 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick view of how the R50 grades vs the X1D II 50C in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Canon R50 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C

 R50 X1D II 50C 
AnnouncedFebruary 2023June 2019Newer by 45 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Canon R50

 X1D II 50C R50 
Screen sizing3.60"3.00"Bigger screen (+0.6")
Screen resolution2360k1040kClearer screen (+1320k dot)

Common features in the Canon R50 and Hasselblad X1D II 50C

 R50 X1D II 50C 
Manual focus More precise focusing
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Canon R50 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Canon R50 enjoys outer dimensions of 116mm x 86mm x 69mm (4.6" x 3.4" x 2.7") and a weight of 375 grams (0.83 lbs) and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C has proportions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs).

Examine the Canon R50 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the R50 and the X1D II 50C.

Canon R50 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the R50 and X1D II 50C is 75 and 60 respectively.

Canon R50 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C top view buttons comparison

Canon R50 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's hard to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions only by researching a spec sheet. The image below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the R50 and X1D II 50C.

Clearly, both of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The R50 due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 27 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The fresher R50 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Canon R50 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C sensor size comparison

Canon R50 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Screen and ViewFinder

Canon R50 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon R50 Portrait photography factors
Hasselblad X1D II 50C Portrait photography factors
82
manual focus
decent MP (24 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
comes with face detect focus
saves RAW files
90
manual focus
flash sync is higher than normal (1/2,000 seconds)
fantastic MP (51 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Medium format)
supports RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon R50
Street photography with Hasselblad X1D II 50C
77
screen can move to multiple angles
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW files
offers focus via touch
great high ISO (32,000)
does not have image stabilization
69
sensor size is great (Medium format)
supports RAW files
offers touch focus
environment proof
great high ISO (25,600)
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Canon R50 Sports photography advice
Hasselblad X1D II 50C Sports photography advice
77
silent shutter (1/8,000s)
decent MP (24 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
comes with tracking focus
sensor has phase detect auto focus
does not have image stabilization
73
quiet mode (1/10,000s)
fantastic MP (51 megapixels)
sensor size is great (Medium format)
includes tracking focus
environment proof
max frames per second low (2.7 fps)
lack of image stabilization
lacks phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Canon R50 Travel photography factors
Hasselblad X1D II 50C Travel photography factors
84
supports bluetooth
offers focus via touch
decent MP (24MP)
has built in flash
selfie friendly display
64
environment proof
offers touch focus
fantastic MP (51 megapixels)
lack of Time Lapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Canon R50
Landscape photography with Hasselblad X1D II 50C
79
manual focus
swap lenses (Canon RF mount)
screen size is good (3.00 inch)
decent MP (24 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
great high ISO (32,000)
saves RAW files
does not have image stabilization
80
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Hasselblad X mount)
lovely big screen (3.60 inch)
fantastic MP (51MP)
sensor size is great (Medium format)
great high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW files
environment proof
2 card slots
lack of image stabilization
lack of Time Lapse recording
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Canon R50
Vlogging with Hasselblad X1D II 50C
77
selfie friendly display
touchscreen capability
comes with face detect focus
video res high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
includes microphone support
does not have image stabilization
32
touchscreen enabled
good video quality (2720 x 1530 pxls)
includes mic support
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Canon R50 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon R50 and Hasselblad X1D II 50C
 Canon EOS R50Hasselblad X1D II 50C
General Information
Brand Name Canon Hasselblad
Model Canon EOS R50 Hasselblad X1D II 50C
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Pro Mirrorless
Announced 2023-02-08 2019-06-19
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Medium format
Sensor dimensions 22.3 x 14.9mm 44 x 33mm
Sensor area 332.3mm² 1,452.0mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixels 51 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1 and 4:3
Highest Possible resolution 6000 x 4000 8272 x 6200
Maximum native ISO 32000 25600
Maximum enhanced ISO 51200 -
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points 651 117
Lens
Lens mount Canon RF Hasselblad X
Available lenses 37 13
Focal length multiplier 1.6 0.8
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display sizing 3.00 inches 3.60 inches
Display resolution 1,040k dots 2,360k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots 3,690k dots
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.59x 0.87x
Features
Min shutter speed 30s 60s
Max shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Max quiet shutter speed 1/8000s 1/10000s
Continuous shutter rate 12.0 frames per sec 2.7 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 6m at ISO 100 no built-in flash
Flash modes - no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Max flash synchronize 1/200s 1/2000s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 230 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 470 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 70 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 30 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 12 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 90 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 170 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 170 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 85 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 85 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 230 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 470 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 70 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 30 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 30 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 12 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 12 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 90 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC 2720 x 1530 (30p)
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 2720x1530
Video format MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None Built-in
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 375 gr (0.83 pounds) 725 gr (1.60 pounds)
Dimensions 116 x 86 x 69mm (4.6" x 3.4" x 2.7") 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 102
DXO Color Depth score not tested 26.2
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 14.8
DXO Low light score not tested 4489
Other
Battery life 370 photographs -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model LP-E17 -
Self timer Yes Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage Single UHS-II SD card slot Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots
Card slots Single Dual
Retail price $679 $5,750