Canon R50 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C
75 Imaging
71 Features
88 Overall
77
60 Imaging
84 Features
74 Overall
80
Canon R50 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 32000 (Raise to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon RF Mount
- 375g - 116 x 86 x 69mm
- Announced February 2023
(Full Review)
- 51MP - Medium format Sensor
- 3.60" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 2720 x 1530 video
- Hasselblad X Mount
- 725g - 150 x 98 x 71mm
- Announced June 2019
- Succeeded the Hasselblad X1D
- Successor is Hasselblad X2D
Photography Glossary Canon R50 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Overview
The following is a complete overview of the Canon R50 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by companies Canon and Hasselblad. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the R50 (24MP) and X1D II 50C (51MP) and the R50 (APS-C) and X1D II 50C (Medium format) feature different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe R50 was released 3 years after the X1D II 50C which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Canon R50 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick view of how the R50 grades vs the X1D II 50C in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon R50 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon EOS R50 and Hasselblad X1D II 50C. The complete galleries are provided at Canon R50 Gallery and Hasselblad X1D II 50C Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon R50 over the Hasselblad X1D II 50C
| R50 | X1D II 50C | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2023 | June 2019 | Newer by 45 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Hasselblad X1D II 50C over the Canon R50
| X1D II 50C | R50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3.60" | 3.00" | Bigger screen (+0.6") | |
| Screen resolution | 2360k | 1040k | Clearer screen (+1320k dot) |
Common features in the Canon R50 and Hasselblad X1D II 50C
| R50 | X1D II 50C | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Canon R50 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Canon R50 enjoys outer dimensions of 116mm x 86mm x 69mm (4.6" x 3.4" x 2.7") and a weight of 375 grams (0.83 lbs) and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C has proportions of 150mm x 98mm x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") with a weight of 725 grams (1.60 lbs).
Examine the Canon R50 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the R50 and the X1D II 50C.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the R50 and X1D II 50C is 75 and 60 respectively.
Canon R50 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions only by researching a spec sheet. The image below may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the R50 and X1D II 50C.
Clearly, both of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The R50 due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field more challenging and the Hasselblad X1D II 50C will provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 27 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The fresher R50 should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon R50 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon R50 vs Hasselblad X1D II 50C Specifications
| Canon EOS R50 | Hasselblad X1D II 50C | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Hasselblad |
| Model | Canon EOS R50 | Hasselblad X1D II 50C |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2023-02-08 | 2019-06-19 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | Medium format |
| Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 44 x 33mm |
| Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 1,452.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 51 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1 and 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 8272 x 6200 |
| Maximum native ISO | 32000 | 25600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 51200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 651 | 117 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Canon RF | Hasselblad X |
| Available lenses | 37 | 13 |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 0.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3.00 inches | 3.60 inches |
| Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 2,360k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 3,690k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.59x | 0.87x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Max quiet shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/10000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 12.0 frames per sec | 2.7 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 6m at ISO 100 | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | - | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/200s | 1/2000s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 230 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 470 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 70 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 30 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 12 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 90 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 170 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 170 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 85 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 85 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 230 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 470 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 70 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 60 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 35 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 30 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 30 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 12 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 12 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 90 Mbps, MP4, H.265, AAC | 2720 x 1530 (30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 2720x1530 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 375 gr (0.83 pounds) | 725 gr (1.60 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 86 x 69mm (4.6" x 3.4" x 2.7") | 150 x 98 x 71mm (5.9" x 3.9" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 102 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 26.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 14.8 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 4489 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 370 photographs | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LP-E17 | - |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Single UHS-II SD card slot | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
| Card slots | Single | Dual |
| Retail price | $679 | $5,750 |