Canon R6 II vs Fujifilm X-T4
61 Imaging
77 Features
92 Overall
83


67 Imaging
70 Features
92 Overall
78
Canon R6 II vs Fujifilm X-T4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400 (Push to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon RF Mount
- 680g - 138 x 98 x 88mm
- Released November 2022
- Previous Model is Canon R6
(Full Review)
- 26MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Raise to 51200)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 607g - 135 x 93 x 64mm
- Launched February 2020
- Previous Model is Fujifilm X-T3
- Refreshed by Fujifilm X-T5

Canon EOS R6 Mark II vs Fujifilm X-T4: Which Mirrorless Camera is Right for You?
Choosing your next camera is a serious decision. It shapes how you capture memories, craft stories, and express your unique vision. Today, we're diving deep into two acclaimed mirrorless cameras: the Canon EOS R6 Mark II and the Fujifilm X-T4. Both have earned passionate followings among enthusiasts and pros alike, but they occupy different sensor platforms, systems, and photographic philosophies.
With over 15 years of hands-on testing - that includes thousands of shots in every discipline from portrait to astrophotography - we'll break down these cameras’ real-world performance, technical specs, and value to help you find your perfect fit.
A Tale of Two Cameras: Overview
Before we jump into the nitty-gritty, let’s lay out where these cameras stand:
Feature | Canon EOS R6 Mark II | Fujifilm X-T4 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Size | Full-frame (36 x 24 mm) | APS-C (23.5 x 15.6 mm) |
Sensor Resolution | 24MP | 26MP |
Lens Mount | Canon RF | Fujifilm X |
Max Native ISO | 102,400 | 12,800 |
Max Boosted ISO | 204,800 | 51,200 |
Max Continuous Shooting Rate | 12 fps (mechanical), 40 fps (electronic) | 15 fps |
IBIS (In-body image stabilization) | 5-axis sensor-shift | 5-axis sensor-shift |
Video Resolution | Up to 4K 60p 10-bit internal | Up to DCI 4K 60p 10-bit internal |
Weight | 680g | 607g |
Body Dimensions (mm) | 138 x 98 x 88 | 135 x 93 x 64 |
Price (Approx.) | $2499 | $1699 |
This quick glance already illustrates some fundamental differences. The Canon packs a larger full-frame sensor and higher ISO headroom, geared towards low-light and depth-rich imagery. Fujifilm’s APS-C sensor is smaller with a crop factor of 1.5x, but it compensates with a higher burst rate and legendary color science.
Canon EOS R6 Mark II is slightly larger and heavier than the more compact Fujifilm X-T4.
Sensor and Image Quality - What Does Sensor Size Mean for You?
Let’s begin with the heart of any camera: the sensor. Canon R6 II houses a 24MP full-frame CMOS sensor, while the Fujifilm X-T4 sports a 26MP APS-C X-Trans CMOS 4 sensor. Both are advanced sensors, but their physical sizes impact image characteristics.
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
- Larger sensor area (864 mm²) translates into superior control over depth of field and greater dynamic range.
- Native ISO range starts at 100 and extends up to 102,400, enabling impressive low light performance, with expansion up to ISO 204,800.
- Anti-aliasing filter presence slightly tempers resolution but reduces moiré for cleaner images.
Fujifilm X-T4
- Smaller sensor area (366.6 mm²) means a crop factor of 1.5x - effective focal lengths become more telephoto, a benefit for wildlife and sports.
- Absence of an AA filter means sharper images with more fine details but at risk of moiré in repetitive patterns.
- Native ISO tops at 12,800 (boostable to 51,200), which is respectable for APS-C but somewhat lower than R6 II for extreme low light scenarios.
Here is a detailed sensor comparison visually:
Full-frame Canon sensor offers greater light gathering capacity; Fujifilm’s APS-C sensor emphasizes sharpness and detail.
In everyday shooting, this translates to Canon delivering smoother gradations and less noise at high ISOs, making it an excellent choice for events, portraits, and night photography. Fujifilm excels in vibrant colors and micro-contrast, thanks to its unique X-Trans sensor pattern.
Autofocus Systems - Speed, Accuracy, and Tracking
Autofocus (AF) performance is critical, especially for fast action and dynamic subjects. Both cameras combine phase-detect and contrast detection for hybrid AF with face and eye detection.
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
- Features a whopping 4,897 AF points, covering nearly the entire frame.
- Advanced Dual Pixel CMOS AF II system offers smooth and fast focusing at all apertures.
- Includes animal eye autofocus (dogs, cats, birds), ideal for wildlife and pets.
- Performs exceptionally well in low light, locking focus down to -6 EV.
Fujifilm X-T4
- Uses 425 AF points, fewer than Canon but still well distributed.
- Lacks animal eye AF (limited to human face detection).
- Effective and accurate phase detection AF on the APS-C sensor.
- Still provides snappy focus performance with continuous tracking but sometimes struggles with erratic subjects compared to Canon.
From my tests, Canon’s tracking beats Fujifilm’s in sports, wildlife, and fast-moving street photography. The Canon’s high AF point density and focus algorithms shine in complex scenes.
Build Quality, Handling, and Ergonomics
A camera that feels like an extension of your creativity encourages longer shoots and better results.
Canon EOS R6 II's deeper grip and larger body offer robust handling; Fujifilm X-T4 embraces retro styling with dedicated dials.
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
- Sturdy magnesium alloy weather-sealed body with dust and moisture resistance.
- Heavier body (680g) provides solid heft.
- Comfortable deep grip for prolonged handheld use.
- Fully articulating 3.0” 1.62-million-dot touchscreen LCD, ideal for vlogging.
- 3.69-million-dot OLED electronic viewfinder (EVF) with 100% coverage and 0.76x magnification.
- Dual UHS-II SD card slots.
- Battery life rated at ~360 shots per charge (testing yielded closer to 400 in real use).
Fujifilm X-T4
- Also boasts dust and weather sealing in a compact, retro-style chassis.
- Lighter at 607g, easier to carry all day.
- Smaller grip better suits compact lenses and street use.
- Identical 3” 1.62-million-dot fully articulating touchscreen.
- Same resolution EVF but slightly smaller at 0.75x magnification.
- Dual UHS-II SD card slots.
- Strong battery life rated at 500 shots - impressive for APS-C mirrorless.
Both cameras sport fully articulating touchscreens, but Canon’s slightly bigger grip aids one-handed operation during video.
Both cameras are robust performers in ergonomics, but Canon’s full-frame size demands bulkier lenses while Fujifilm’s compact design is friendlier for travel and street photography. The tactile dials on the X-T4 evoke classic film cameras, which may appeal to users who prefer manual exposure controls.
Lens Ecosystem and Compatibility
The RF mount for Canon R6 II and Fujifilm X mount offer contrasting ecosystems:
- Canon RF mount: Over 35 native RF lenses available and growing rapidly, including top-tier optics with professional quality. RF lenses are big but offer superb image quality and fast apertures.
- Fujifilm X mount: One of the richest APS-C ecosystems with over 54 native lenses. Fujifilm offers many compact primes and zooms that balance performance and portability.
Given the sensor discrepancy, lenses on the Fujifilm are effectively more telephoto due to the crop factor, which is advantageous for wildlife and sports but less flexible for wide-angle shooting.
Burst Shooting, Speed, and Buffer Depth
- Canon EOS R6 II offers 12 fps mechanical shutter and a blistering 40 fps electronic shutter burst, excellent for high-speed action capture like sports or wildlife.
- Fujifilm X-T4 maxes at 15 fps mechanical, no high-speed silent burst, but still solid for most scenarios.
Canon’s 40 fps electronic shutter is a significant advantage for professional applications requiring rapid frame capture without mechanical wear.
In-Body Image Stabilization (IBIS)
Both cameras feature 5-axis sensor-shift stabilization:
- Canon R6 II uses advanced IBIS maximizing up to 8 stops of shake reduction combined with lens IS.
- Fujifilm X-T4 IBIS offers ~6.5 stops with compatible lenses.
In real-world handheld shooting, the Canon tends to grant steadier video and sharper stills in low-light without a tripod, but Fujifilm’s IBIS performs admirably, especially given the smaller sensor size.
Video Capabilities - Hybrid Workhorses
If you’re a hybrid creator - shooting stills and video - these cameras have plenty to offer.
Feature | Canon EOS R6 Mark II | Fujifilm X-T4 |
---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution | 4K UHD up to 60p @ 10-bit 4:2:2 | DCI 4K up to 60p @ 10-bit 4:2:0 |
Slow Motion | Full HD up to 120p | Full HD up to 240p |
Internal Recording Codecs | H.264, H.265 | H.264, H.265 |
External Mic & Headphone | Both available | Both available |
Articulating Screen | Fully articulating | Fully articulating |
Video Bitrate | Up to 230 Mbps (4K 60p) | Up to 400 Mbps (4K 30p / DCI) |
The Fujifilm X-T4 records DCI 4K (4096x2160) and boasts a very flexible 240 fps slow motion in Full HD, great for creative video. Canon delivers reliable 4K 60p with internal 10-bit 4:2:2, favoring crisp color grading workflows.
The two headphone/mic ports make audio monitoring easy for vloggers and filmmakers on either model.
Photography Genres - Which Camera Excels Where?
With all specs compared, here’s how each camera performs across key photographic disciplines:
Summary of genre-specific strengths and camera suitability.
Portrait Photography
- Canon R6 II wins for skin tone rendition and bokeh thanks to full-frame sensor and RF lens quality.
- Eye and face AF, including animal eye detection, ensure sharp subject focus.
Landscape Photography
- Canon’s dynamic range helps retain shadow and highlight details.
- Fujifilm's sharp 26MP sensor offers great resolution for large prints.
- Both have weather sealing for rugged outdoor use.
Wildlife Photography
- Canon’s more sensitive AF and faster burst (40 fps) is a key advantage.
- Fujifilm’s effective focal length crop is beneficial for telephoto reach.
Sports Photography
- Canon’s burst speed and tracking AF outperform the Fujifilm.
- Fujifilm offers quicker mechanical burst (15 fps) but less effective AF tracking for extreme sports.
Street Photography
- Fujifilm’s lighter body and compact lenses afford greater portability.
- Canon’s larger size may be less discreet but compensates with superior AF and low light capabilities.
Macro Photography
- Both support focus bracketing; Canon supports focus stacking.
- IBIS helps with handheld macro shots on both.
Night & Astro Photography
- Canon’s high ISO performance delivers cleaner images in faint light.
- Fujifilm requires careful ISO management but shines with detail due to no AA filter.
Video
- Fujifilm’s extensive 4K options and high bitrate 10-bit H.265 recordings benefit serious filmmakers.
- Canon offers reliable 4K 60p for hybrid shooters and smoother video AF.
Travel Photography
- Fujifilm’s smaller size, lighter weight, and broader lens selection make it a versatile travel companion.
- Canon’s powerful sensor and robust AF shine in varied lighting.
Professional Work
- Canon’s file formats, superior AF system, and high burst rates deliver the reliability demanded by pros.
- Fujifilm excels in creative workflows with classic film simulations popular among certain professionals.
Real-World Image Samples
To put pixel peeping into perspective, here are side-by-side sample images illustrating portrait skin tones and landscape dynamic range:
Left: Canon R6 II portrait, displaying smooth bokeh and accurate skin tones. Right: Fujifilm X-T4 landscape shot, showing high detail and rich colors.
Storage, Connectivity, and Battery Life
- Both cameras offer dual SD card slots with UHS-II support, a must-have feature for professional reliability.
- Canon includes faster USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) vs Fujifilm’s USB 3.1 Gen 1.
- Both feature built-in WiFi and Bluetooth enabling remote control and image transfer.
- Neither includes GPS.
- Battery life differs: Fujifilm X-T4's rated at 500 shots (stronger), Canon R6 II around 360 (adequate but less).
Price and Value Assessment
Currently:
- Canon EOS R6 Mark II retails around $2,499. This puts it in the pro-grade segment focused on speed, low light, and video hybrid use.
- Fujifilm X-T4 comes at approximately $1,699, offering a seriously capable feature set at a more approachable price.
For photographers on a budget seeking a versatile yet premium camera, Fujifilm offers a fantastic value. If ultimate image quality, autofocus sophistication, and video versatility are priority, Canon justifies its premium tag.
Summary Scores at a Glance
Performance Overview: Canon R6 II excels in low light and autofocus; Fujifilm X-T4 scores high in handling and video versatility.
Final Recommendations: Your Next Camera Choice
Who Should Choose the Canon EOS R6 Mark II?
- You desire the best in high ISO performance for night, wedding, or event photography.
- Fast and accurate AF with extensive tracking is critical (sports, wildlife).
- Require a camera that supports professional video workflows (4K 60p, 10-bit internal).
- You prefer or already own RF lenses and want full-frame sensor advantages.
- Build quality and robust weather sealing matter for professional demanding environments.
Who Should Consider the Fujifilm X-T4?
- You want a lighter, more portable camera for travel, street, and lifestyle photography.
- Appreciate tactile controls and classic Fujifilm color science out-of-the-box.
- Shoot hybrid creative video needing rich color profiles and high bitrate 4K recording.
- Desire a larger native APS-C lens ecosystem with extensive prime options.
- Working with a tighter budget but still demand premium features.
Get Hands-On and Explore
No spec sheet substitutes the experience of holding and using each camera. Visit your local camera store and try both bodies with lenses you like. Whichever you choose, both Canon EOS R6 Mark II and Fujifilm X-T4 elevate your vision with stellar imaging tools crafted through years of innovation.
Find the right accessories - robust straps, extra batteries, memory cards - to complement your shooting style and get ready to capture stunning imagery that tells your unique story.
By weighing the pros and cons here with your photography goals, you can confidently select a mirrorless camera that supports your creative journey for years to come. Happy shooting!
Canon R6 II vs Fujifilm X-T4 Specifications
Canon EOS R6 Mark II | Fujifilm X-T4 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model | Canon EOS R6 Mark II | Fujifilm X-T4 |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2022-11-02 | 2020-02-24 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | X-Trans CMOS 4 |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 26MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 6240 x 4160 |
Maximum native ISO | 102400 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | 204800 | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 160 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 50 | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 4897 | 425 |
Cross focus points | 1053 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Canon RF | Fujifilm X |
Number of lenses | 35 | 54 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3.00 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,620k dots | 1,620k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,690k dots | 3,690k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.76x | 0.75x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/16000 seconds | 1/32000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 12.0 frames per second | 15.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 230 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 120 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 120 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 60 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 30 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p / 30 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 4096 x 2160 @ 60p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 50p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 400 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 25p / 400 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 400 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 400 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 50p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 240p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.265, Linear PCM1920 |
Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 4096x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 680g (1.50 pounds) | 607g (1.34 pounds) |
Dimensions | 138 x 98 x 88mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 3.5") | 135 x 93 x 64mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 shots | 500 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LP-E6NH | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | Dual SD slots (UHS-II supported) | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC card slots (UHS-II supported) |
Card slots | 2 | 2 |
Launch cost | $2,499 | $1,700 |