Olympus 8010 vs Olympus VG-160
92 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
Olympus 8010 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 8010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus 8010 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Here is a extended overview of the Olympus 8010 versus Olympus VG-160, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both manufactured by Olympus. The resolution of the 8010 (13MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is very well matched and they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe 8010 was introduced 23 months earlier than the VG-160 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick overview of how the 8010 matches up vs the VG-160 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photography Glossary Olympus 8010 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 and Olympus VG-160. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus 8010 Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Olympus VG-160
| 8010 | VG-160 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Olympus 8010
| VG-160 | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | February 2010 | Fresher by 23 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus 8010 and Olympus VG-160
| 8010 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Olympus 8010 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus 8010 enjoys exterior dimensions of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Olympus VG-160 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Compare the Olympus 8010 versus Olympus VG-160 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that time. The following is the front view scale comparison of the 8010 against the VG-160.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the 8010 and VG-160 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Olympus 8010 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizing only by reading through specs. The graphic below may give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the 8010 and VG-160.
All in all, both cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus VG-160 to resolve extra detail using its extra 1MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The older 8010 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus 8010 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus 8010 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
| Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Olympus VG-160 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | Olympus VG-160 |
| Also called | mju Tough 8010 | - |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2010-02-02 | 2012-01-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 13 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 7cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.80 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 245g (0.54 pounds) | 125g (0.28 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 165 pictures |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-50B | LI-70B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $600 | $90 |