Canon R8 vs Fujifilm X-T200
71 Imaging
79 Features
85 Overall
81
![Canon EOS R8 front Canon EOS R8 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Canon-EOS-R8/Canon-R8-front.jpg)
![Fujifilm X-T200 front Fujifilm X-T200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Fujifilm-X-T200/Fujifilm-X-T200-front.jpg)
80 Imaging
70 Features
87 Overall
76
Canon R8 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.00" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400 (Push to 204800)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon RF Mount
- 461g - 133 x 86 x 70mm
- Announced February 2023
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.5" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Increase to 51200)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 370g - 121 x 84 x 55mm
- Introduced January 2020
- Older Model is Fujifilm X-T100
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Canon R8 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Overview
Here, we are comparing the Canon R8 vs Fujifilm X-T200, one being a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Canon and FujiFilm. The resolution of the R8 (24MP) and the Fujifilm X-T200 (24MP) is fairly well matched but the R8 (Full frame) and Fujifilm X-T200 (APS-C) boast different sensor sizing.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
The R8 was introduced 3 years later than the Fujifilm X-T200 and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise view of how the R8 matches up vs the Fujifilm X-T200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Canon R8 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon EOS R8 and Fujifilm X-T200. The whole galleries are viewable at Canon R8 Gallery and Fujifilm X-T200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon R8 over the Fujifilm X-T200
R8 | Fujifilm X-T200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2023 | ![]() | January 2020 | Fresher by 38 months |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-T200 over the Canon R8
Fujifilm X-T200 | R8 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3.5" | ![]() | 3.00" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 2780k | ![]() | 1620k | Clearer display (+1160k dot) |
Common features in the Canon R8 and Fujifilm X-T200
R8 | Fujifilm X-T200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Both are selfie friendly | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Canon R8 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Canon R8 comes with outside dimensions of 133mm x 86mm x 70mm (5.2" x 3.4" x 2.8") and a weight of 461 grams (1.02 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm X-T200 has proportions of 121mm x 84mm x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") along with a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon R8 vs Fujifilm X-T200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the R8 compared to the Fujifilm X-T200.
![Canon R8 vs Fujifilm X-T200 size comparison Canon R8 vs Fujifilm X-T200 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-EOS-R8-vs-Fujifilm-X-T200-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the R8 and Fujifilm X-T200 is 71 and 80 respectively.
![Canon R8 vs Fujifilm X-T200 top view buttons comparison Canon R8 vs Fujifilm X-T200 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-EOS-R8-vs-Fujifilm-X-T200-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Canon R8 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing only by reading through technical specs. The graphic underneath may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the R8 and Fujifilm X-T200.
As you have seen, both of those cameras feature the identical MP but different sensor sizing. The R8 comes with the larger sensor which is going to make getting bokeh easier. The more modern R8 should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
![Canon R8 vs Fujifilm X-T200 sensor size comparison Canon R8 vs Fujifilm X-T200 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Canon-EOS-R8-vs-Fujifilm-X-T200-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Canon R8 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Screen and ViewFinder
![Canon R8 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon R8 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-EOS-R8-vs-Fujifilm-X-T200-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Canon R8 vs Fujifilm X-T200 Specifications
Canon EOS R8 | Fujifilm X-T200 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model | Canon EOS R8 | Fujifilm X-T200 |
Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Announced | 2023-02-08 | 2020-01-22 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 102400 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 204800 | 51200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 50 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 1053 | 425 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Canon RF | Fujifilm X |
Number of lenses | 37 | 54 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3.00 inches | 3.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,620k dots | 2,780k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.76x | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/16000 secs | 1/32000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 6.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 60p / 230 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 120 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 120 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 120 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 60 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 30 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p / 30 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264, H.265 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 461 grams (1.02 lb) | 370 grams (0.82 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 133 x 86 x 70mm (5.2" x 3.4" x 2.8") | 121 x 84 x 55mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 93 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 24.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 14.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 3295 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 images | 270 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LP-E17 | NP-W126S |
Self timer | Yes | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | Single UHS-II SD card slot | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $1,499 | $699 |