Canon RP vs Olympus E-M1 III
70 Imaging
75 Features
80 Overall
77
67 Imaging
61 Features
96 Overall
75
Canon RP vs Olympus E-M1 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 26MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 40000 (Bump to 102400)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon RF Mount
- 485g - 133 x 85 x 70mm
- Revealed February 2019
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 580g - 134 x 91 x 69mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M1 II
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon RP vs Olympus E-M1 III Overview
The following is a thorough analysis of the Canon RP and Olympus E-M1 III, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by brands Canon and Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the RP (26MP) and E-M1 III (20MP) and the RP (Full frame) and E-M1 III (Four Thirds) feature totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe RP was released 12 months before the E-M1 III which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a short summation of how the RP grades against the E-M1 III with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon RP vs Olympus E-M1 III Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon EOS RP and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III. The complete galleries are available at Canon RP Gallery and Olympus E-M1 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon RP over the Olympus E-M1 III
| RP | E-M1 III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 1037k | Sharper screen (+3k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 III over the Canon RP
| E-M1 III | RP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2020 |  | February 2019 | Newer by 12 months |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Canon RP and Olympus E-M1 III
| RP | E-M1 III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Canon RP vs Olympus E-M1 III Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Canon RP has physical dimensions of 133mm x 85mm x 70mm (5.2" x 3.3" x 2.8") with a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs) while the Olympus E-M1 III has measurements of 134mm x 91mm x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 580 grams (1.28 lbs).
See the Canon RP and Olympus E-M1 III in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the RP compared to the E-M1 III.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the RP and E-M1 III is 70 and 67 respectively.
Canon RP vs Olympus E-M1 III Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to see the gap between sensor dimensions only by reading through technical specs. The picture underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the RP and E-M1 III.
As you can tell, the two cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The RP because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Canon RP will give extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged RP is going to be behind in sensor tech.
Canon RP vs Olympus E-M1 III Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Canon RP vs Olympus E-M1 III Specifications
| Canon EOS RP | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon EOS RP | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark III |
| Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2019-02-14 | 2020-02-11 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Digic 8 | TruePic IX |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
| Sensor dimensions | 35.9 x 24mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 861.6mm² | 226.2mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 26MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 6240 x 4160 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 40000 | 25600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 102400 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Lowest boosted ISO | 50 | 64 |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 4779 | 121 |
| Cross focus points | - | 121 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Canon RF | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 17 | 107 |
| Crop factor | 1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fully Articulated | Fully Articulated |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 1,040k dots | 1,037k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 2,360k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.7x | 0.74x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/8000s |
| Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 60.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | no built-in flash | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | 1/180s | 1/250s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 120 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 4096x2160 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | Yes | USB 3.1 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 485g (1.07 lb) | 580g (1.28 lb) |
| Dimensions | 133 x 85 x 70mm (5.2" x 3.3" x 2.8") | 134 x 91 x 69mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 85 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 24.0 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.9 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 2977 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 shots | 420 shots |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | BLH-1 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots (UHS-II on first slot) |
| Card slots | Single | Dual |
| Pricing at launch | $999 | $1,800 |