Canon RP vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
70 Imaging
76 Features
80 Overall
77
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Canon RP vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 26MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 40000 (Increase to 102400)
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Canon RF Mount
- 485g - 133 x 85 x 70mm
- Introduced February 2019
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Launched November 2009
Canon RP vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Below, we are matching up the Canon RP versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, both Advanced Mirrorless digital cameras by competitors Canon and Ricoh. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the RP (26MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the RP (Full frame) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) come with totally different sensor sizes.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe RP was unveiled 9 years later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Canon RP being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise view of how the RP scores against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Canon RP vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon EOS RP & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The full galleries are viewable at Canon RP Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon RP over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
RP | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2019 | November 2009 | More recent by 113 months | |
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 920k | Clearer display (+120k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Canon RP
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | RP |
---|
Common features in the Canon RP and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
RP | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Canon RP vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you should consider its weight and size. The Canon RP enjoys exterior measurements of 133mm x 85mm x 70mm (5.2" x 3.3" x 2.8") and a weight of 485 grams (1.07 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon RP versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the RP compared to the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the RP and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 70 and 77 respectively.
Canon RP vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements merely by reading specs. The visual underneath might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the RP and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
All in all, both of these cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The RP using its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Canon RP will offer greater detail having an extra 14 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more modern RP will have an advantage in sensor tech.
Canon RP vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Canon RP vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Canon EOS RP | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Ricoh |
Model type | Canon EOS RP | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Type | Advanced Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2019-02-14 | 2009-11-10 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Digic 8 | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 35.9 x 24mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 861.6mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 26 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 6240 x 4160 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 40000 | 3200 |
Max boosted ISO | 102400 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Min boosted ISO | 50 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 4779 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Canon RF | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 50mm (1x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 17 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.7x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 180 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 3.00 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 120 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | Yes | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 485 gr (1.07 lb) | 453 gr (1.00 lb) |
Dimensions | 133 x 85 x 70mm (5.2" x 3.3" x 2.8") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 85 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 24.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.9 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 2977 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 250 shots | 320 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $999 | $566 |