Clicky

Canon SL3 vs Olympus E-520

Portability
71
Imaging
69
Features
84
Overall
75
Canon EOS Rebel SL3 front
 
Olympus E-520 front
Portability
68
Imaging
45
Features
45
Overall
45

Canon SL3 vs Olympus E-520 Key Specs

Canon SL3
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600 (Boost to 51200)
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Canon EF/EF-S Mount
  • 449g - 122 x 93 x 70mm
  • Released April 2019
  • Alternate Name is EOS 250D / EOS Kiss X10
  • Succeeded the Canon SL2
Olympus E-520
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
  • Introduced August 2008
  • Older Model is Olympus E-510
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon SL3 vs Olympus E-520 Overview

Below, we will be looking at the Canon SL3 and Olympus E-520, both Entry-Level DSLR cameras by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the SL3 (24MP) and E-520 (10MP) and the SL3 (APS-C) and E-520 (Four Thirds) use totally different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The SL3 was released 10 years later than the E-520 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact SLR).

Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a short summary of how the SL3 grades vs the E-520 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon SL3 over the Olympus E-520

 SL3 E-520 
IntroducedApril 2019August 2008Fresher by 130 months
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1040k230kCrisper screen (+810k dot)
Selfie screen Easy selfies
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Canon SL3

 E-520 SL3 

Common features in the Canon SL3 and Olympus E-520

 SL3 E-520 
Manual focus Dial accurate focusing

Canon SL3 vs Olympus E-520 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon SL3 offers physical dimensions of 122mm x 93mm x 70mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 2.8") with a weight of 449 grams (0.99 lbs) whilst the Olympus E-520 has measurements of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") accompanied by a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs).

See the Canon SL3 and Olympus E-520 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the SL3 and the E-520.

Canon SL3 vs Olympus E-520 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the SL3 and E-520 is 71 and 68 respectively.

Canon SL3 vs Olympus E-520 top view buttons comparison

Canon SL3 vs Olympus E-520 Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, its hard to envision the gap in sensor sizing merely by researching technical specs. The photograph here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the SL3 and E-520.

As you can tell, both the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The SL3 due to its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Canon SL3 will render greater detail as a result of its extra 14MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The newer SL3 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.

Canon SL3 vs Olympus E-520 sensor size comparison

Canon SL3 vs Olympus E-520 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon SL3 vs Olympus E-520 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon SL3 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus E-520 as a Portrait photography camera
81
you can focus manually
MP count decent (24 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
provides face detect focus
exports RAW files
59
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
has face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
MP count low (10MP)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Canon SL3 as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-520 as a Street photography camera
75
screen articulates
decent sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW files
includes touch to focus
above average ISO range (25,600)
does not have image stabilization
65
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
screen is fixed
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Sports Comparison

Canon SL3 Sports photography highlights
Olympus E-520 Sports photography highlights
70
MP count decent (24 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
provides tracking focus
better than average battery power (1,070 per charge)
has phase detect auto focus
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
55
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
better than average battery power (650 shots)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
max frames per second low (4.0 fps)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Canon SL3
Travel photography with Olympus E-520
82
better than average battery power (1,070 shots)
has bluetooth
includes touch to focus
MP count decent (24MP)
has built in flash
selfie friendly display
52
better than average battery power (650 CIPA)
flash built-in
missing Timelapse recording
MP count low (10 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Canon SL3 Landscape photography information
Olympus E-520 Landscape photography information
79
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Canon EF/EF-S mount)
screen size is decent (3")
MP count decent (24 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
above average ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
better than average battery power (1,070 per charge)
does not have image stabilization
58
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
better than average battery power (650 shots)
small screen (2.7 inches)
MP count low (10MP)
missing Timelapse recording
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Canon SL3 Vlogging info
Olympus E-520 Vlogging info
75
selfie friendly display
touchscreen enabled
provides face detect focus
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
has microphone socket
does not have image stabilization
9
no video shooting
Photography Glossary

Canon SL3 vs Olympus E-520 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon SL3 and Olympus E-520
 Canon EOS Rebel SL3Olympus E-520
General Information
Make Canon Olympus
Model type Canon EOS Rebel SL3 Olympus E-520
Otherwise known as EOS 250D / EOS Kiss X10 -
Type Entry-Level DSLR Entry-Level DSLR
Released 2019-04-10 2008-08-20
Body design Compact SLR Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Powered by DIGIC 8 -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 22.3 x 14.9mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 332.3mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Maximum resolution 6000 x 4000 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 25600 1600
Maximum boosted ISO 51200 -
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 9 3
Cross type focus points 1 -
Lens
Lens support Canon EF/EF-S Micro Four Thirds
Number of lenses 326 45
Crop factor 1.6 2.1
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display size 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 1,040 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage 95% 95%
Viewfinder magnification 0.54x 0.46x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 seconds 60 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 5.0 frames per sec 4.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings - Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 120 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC -
Maximum video resolution 3840x2160 None
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 449 gr (0.99 pounds) 552 gr (1.22 pounds)
Dimensions 122 x 93 x 70mm (4.8" x 3.7" x 2.8") 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 55
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 21.4
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.4
DXO Low light rating not tested 548
Other
Battery life 1070 images 650 images
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LP-E17 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I compatible) Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Storage slots Single Single
Retail pricing $599 $400