Canon T6 vs Fujifilm F750EXR
68 Imaging
61 Features
62 Overall
61
90 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Canon T6 vs Fujifilm F750EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Bump to 12800)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Canon EF/EF-S Mount
- 485g - 129 x 101 x 78mm
- Launched March 2016
- Additionally referred to as EOS Rebel 1300D
- Old Model is Canon 1200D
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 234g - 105 x 63 x 36mm
- Announced January 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Comparing the Canon EOS T6 vs. Fujifilm FinePix F750EXR: Which Camera Fits Your Photography Life?
When it comes to choosing a camera, the landscape is vast - and sometimes downright intimidating. Especially when two cameras come from different traditions, target audiences, and technologies. The Canon EOS T6 (aka Rebel 1300D) is a classic entry-level DSLR, while the Fujifilm FinePix F750EXR is an intriguing small-sensor superzoom compact. Having extensively tested both cameras - and over a thousand others - I’m excited to walk you through a no-nonsense comparison that digs beyond specs to real-world use.
Whether you’re an eager hobbyist, a budget-conscious traveler, or someone dipping toes into photography, this head-to-head will help you figure out which camera is truly worth your time and money. Ready? Let’s dive in.
Size Matters: Ergonomics and Handling
If you’ve ever wrestled with a camera that felt awkward in your hands, you know ergonomics can make or break your experience. While image quality is paramount, how a camera feels nudges some people away faster than subpar photo results.
First up: the Canon EOS T6. As a compact DSLR, it boasts a robust grip and a substantial hand-feel - even for slender-handed folk. It weighs in at 485g (body only) and measures about 129 x 101 x 78 mm. Meanwhile, the Fujifilm F750EXR is a petite marvel of pocket portability: 234g and 105 x 63 x 36 mm.

The Canon's physical heft aids stability, especially with heavier lenses, while the Fuji’s smaller footprint excels in unobtrusive street or travel shooting. The tradeoff? You’re not getting DSLR-like manual control with the Fuji's convenience.
I've often found that prolonged shooting sessions - say in wildlife or sports - favor a camera that gives your hands something substantial to hold (Canon T6). But casual outings, city strolls, or situations requiring stealth appreciate the Fuji’s lightweight nature.
Verdict: Prefer significant control and comfort? Canon T6 wins. Need grab-and-go simplicity? Fuji’s your pocket companion.
Top-Down: Control Layout and Usability
Now, let's peek from above and see how intuitive these cameras feel when you finger their dials and buttons.

The Canon T6 sports a familiar DSLR top layout: mode dial, dedicated ISO button, shutter speed and aperture control via the lens and dial combos, and a hot shoe for external flashes. This design favors photographers used to the tactile feedback and direct adjustments - especially handy when you want to tweak exposure on the fly.
Fujifilm’s F750EXR, by contrast, simplifies with fewer physical controls, relying more on menu access. Sporting a mode dial and a few direct buttons, its interface aligns with compact camera users who prioritize simplicity over speed.
My experience with the T6 was that it feels like a serious tool you can grow into. Changing from aperture priority to manual exposure was a breeze, while Fuji’s menus sometimes slowed me down, especially when shooting fast-moving subjects.
Expert tip: For genres like sports or wildlife, quick manual overrides can save missed shots - giving an advantage to Canon’s physical layout.
Sensor Size and Image Quality: The Heart of the Matter
Here’s the crux of most photography debates: sensor technology. Canon's T6 uses an APS-C sized CMOS sensor (22.3 x 14.9 mm), while the Fuji F750EXR relies on a much smaller 1/2" EXR CMOS sensor (6.4 x 4.8 mm).

Let’s unpack what that means:
-
Sensor Area: Canon ~332.27 mm² vs. Fuji ~30.72 mm² - over 10 times larger for Canon.
-
Resolution: Canon offers 18MP, Fuji 16MP, but considering sensor size, Fuji crams pixels tighter, impacting noise and dynamic range.
-
ISO Performance: Canon native ISO 100-6400, expandable to 12,800; Fuji tops at ISO 3200.
In practical terms, the larger APS-C sensor in the Canon means superior low-light performance, greater dynamic range (11.7 EV measured), and better color depth (22 bits reported) compared to the Fuji’s small sensor. You get cleaner images with less noise and richer tonality shooting with the T6, especially in shadows or night scenes.
By contrast, the Fuji’s advantage is in its zoom reach - not its imaging prowess. Those with patience can coax nice daytime photos from the Fuji, but under challenging light, it quickly shows limitations. I routinely found the Canon capable of producing cleaner files with more post-processing latitude.
What's on the Back? Screen and Interface Experience
Shooting with your eye to a viewfinder is classic, but live view screens are indispensable for composing angles or for novices learning settings.

The Canon T6 sports a fixed 3-inch LCD with 920k-dot resolution - respectable clarity for reviewing shots. The Fujifilm F750EXR has a similar 3-inch display but only 460k-dot resolution. Neither has articulating or touch capability, which is admittedly a drawback by today’s standards.
Shooting outdoors, the Canon’s brighter, higher-res screen wins for framing and reviewing images. Fuji’s lower resolution screen sometimes made focusing confirmation tricky, especially under strong sunlight.
Neither camera offers an electronic viewfinder, but Canon’s optical pentamirror viewfinder covers about 95% of the scene - quick and reliable in bright conditions without latency.
How Do the Images Stack Up? Real-World Results
Numbers and specs aside, your photos ultimately tell the tale.
Canon T6 samples exhibit wide dynamic range and fine detail in landscapes and portraits.
Fujifilm F750EXR handles bright daylight scenes well but struggles with noise and softness in shadows.
I put both to the test across multiple genres (more on that below), but here are some overall observations:
-
Portraits: Canon’s APS-C depth and color fidelity translates to creamy skin tones and natural bokeh transitions with prime lenses. The Fuji’s small sensor compresses depth-of-field less effectively, often rendering backgrounds less artistically blurred.
-
Landscapes: The T6’s dynamic range preserves highlight and shadow detail breathtakingly, especially with RAW files - essential for post-processing. Fuji’s narrower latitude struggles, clipping highlights easily in bright skies.
-
Wildlife/Sports: Canon’s faster, more accurate autofocus system with 9 AF points and cross-types helps nail sharp focus on erratic subjects, even in low light. Fuji’s contrast detection AF is slower and less reliable for tracking.
-
Street/Travel: Fuji’s swift 11fps burst rate beats Canon’s 3fps and its compact size makes it less conspicuous - ideal for candid moments. But image quality trades off accordingly.
In short, if you demand image quality and control, Canon clearly holds the upper hand. But if portability and zoom power dominate your priorities, Fuji remains compelling.
Autofocus Systems: Speed and Accuracy for Action
Let’s get technical with focusing prowess - critical in wildlife, sports, and macro work.
The Canon T6 combines phase-detection (via the DSLR's dedicated AF sensor) and contrast detection (live view mode), offering 9 AF points (with center cross-type sensor). This system reliably locks focus quickly on human faces and moderate-action subjects.
Fujifilm F750EXR employs contrast-detection autofocus only, as common with most compact cameras, and unfortunately does not reveal number of AF points. Its focusing speed is fast enough for casual everyday shooting but struggles in dimmer light or with moving objects.
With Canon, I regularly achieved crisp focus on fast-moving wildlife and athletes. Fuji, while decent outdoors, lagged on focus acquisition and tracking.
For photographers prioritizing wildlife or sports, Canon’s hybrid AF and phase-detection will serve better - especially paired with appropriate lenses.
Build Quality, Weather Sealing, and Durability
Neither camera is weather-sealed - but their build philosophies differ.
Canon T6’s rugged DSLR body, while plastic-heavy, feels solid and dependable - handle it with reasonable care, and it’ll last. Fuji’s small superzoom compact is lighter and more delicate, better shielded by cautious use rather than any ruggedness.
If you’re trekking the outdoors or shooting in variable weather, neither is ideal without protective housing. But I do trust the T6 to better withstand frequent handling and lens changes.
Lens Ecosystems and Versatility
One undeniable strength of the Canon T6 is its access to the enormous Canon EF/EF-S lens lineup - over 300 lenses from ultra-wide to telephoto, primes to zooms, from affordable to pro-level.
Fujifilm F750EXR is a fixed-lens zoom with an impressive 25-500mm equivalent (20x optical zoom), featuring a variable aperture of f/3.5-5.3. Its lens versatility is convenience-focused - no lens changes, but optical compromises exist (notably softness toward telephoto end).
For creatives craving the freedom to experiment with prime lenses, fast apertures, or specialized optics (macro, tilt-shift), Canon’s ecosystem wins hands down.
Battery Life and Storage Options
Another practical aspect: endurance during outings.
Canon T6’s LP-E10 battery boasts about 500 shots per charge - impressive for an entry DSLR. Storage formats support SD, SDHC, and SDXC cards.
Fujifilm F750EXR uses a smaller NP-50A battery; actual battery life details are scarce, but superzoom compacts typically offer fewer shots per charge. It also accepts SD/SDHC/SDXC cards.
Longer battery life helps especially for travel, wildlife, and event shooting - points again for Canon.
Connectivity and Wireless Features
In the modern photo world, connectivity matters.
Canon T6 surprisingly includes built-in Wi-Fi with NFC support but no Bluetooth. This facilitates remote shooting and image transfer to compatible smartphones - handy for sharing on social media straight from the field.
Fujifilm F750EXR offers no wireless features, relying on physical USB and HDMI ports.
For Instagrammers or photojournalists needing quick uploads, Canon's connectivity is a plus.
Video Capabilities: Beyond Stills
Both cameras shoot Full HD 1080p video at 30fps, with Canon’s T6 also offering 24fps and 720p at 60fps options. Video formats for both are MPEG-4 and H.264.
Neither offers 4K or advanced video features, and neither supports external microphones or headphones - limits that restrict serious videographers.
Canon’s larger sensor generally yields better low-light video quality, though autofocus during video is basic. Fuji’s small sensor and fixed lens mean video tends to be noisier and less refined.
For casual video, either suffices. For more demanding uses, one would consider a dedicated hybrid camera or mirrorless systems.
How Each Camera Excels by Photography Genre
Having tested these cameras across multiple disciplines, here’s a quick breakdown:
-
Portraits: Canon’s sensor and lens choices produce superior skin tones and creamy bokeh.
-
Landscape: Canon offers dynamic range and detail; Fuji lacks latitude and detail in shadows.
-
Wildlife: Canon’s AF speed and lens flexibility edge out Fuji’s slower focus and fixed zoom.
-
Sports: Canon’s lower frame rate is a limitation but better AF tracking; Fuji’s fast burst rate is offset by poorer autofocus.
-
Street: Fuji’s discrete size and zoom range favored for travel and street candid shots.
-
Macro: Canon - not designed for macro out of the box - but with macro lenses, it outperforms Fuji’s fixed lens and limited minimum focus distance.
-
Night/Astro: Canon’s ISO capabilities and sensor size yield cleaner low-light shots; Fuji struggles with noise.
-
Video: Comparable basic Full HD; Canon’s larger sensor translates to better image quality.
-
Travel: Fuji’s size and zoom win for lightweight travelling; Canon balances image quality with bulkier form.
-
Professional Use: Canon supports RAW capture (critical), broad lens choice, and workflow integration; Fuji lacks RAW and lens versatility.
Overall Scoring: Where They Stand in the Big Picture
Here’s a summation of the performances across categories, weighted by real-world impact:
Canon EOS T6 scores solidly in image quality, ergonomics, versatility; stumbles on video features and frame rate.
Fujifilm F750EXR impresses with zoom and portability but falls behind in sensor performance and advanced controls.
Final Thoughts and Recommendations: Who Should Buy What?
Both the Canon EOS T6 and the Fujifilm FinePix F750EXR carve distinct niches - this isn’t about which is objectively “better” but which suits you.
Choose Canon EOS T6 if:
- Image quality and low-light performance are paramount.
- You want to learn manual controls and grow photographer skills.
- You desire access to a robust lens lineup.
- You shoot portraits, landscapes, wildlife, sports, or pro work.
- You appreciate a traditional DSLR feel and optical viewfinder.
- You require Wi-Fi and RAW shooting capability.
In other words, the T6 is a solid entry-level DSLR for enthusiasts craving serious photo quality and flexibility on a reasonable budget.
Choose Fujifilm FinePix F750EXR if:
- You want maximum zoom flexibility in a pocketable package.
- Your focus is casual travel, street photography, or snapping distant subjects without lens swapping.
- Portability and speed (burst shooting) are more important than ultimate image quality.
- You prefer point-and-shoot simplicity, not diving deep into manual controls.
- You are primarily shooting in good daylight conditions.
The Fuji makes an appealing compact superzoom for travelers and hobbyists who value convenience over pro-level features.
Putting It Into Practice: My Personal Experience Shooting Both
I took the Canon T6 on a mountain hike and found its weight reassuring when tracking birds through a telephoto lens - each shot felt purposeful, manual focusing felt tactile, and post-processing its RAW files was a joy.
On a city trip, the Fuji F750EXR fit easily in my jacket pocket, letting me grab street scenes on the fly with excellent zoom reach - though I noticed softness creeping into evening shots.
Both are trustworthy companions in their realms - but knowing their strengths lets you pick your perfect photographic ally.
Summary Table at a Glance:
| Feature | Canon EOS T6 | Fujifilm FinePix F750EXR |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Size | APS-C (22.3x14.9 mm) | 1/2" (6.4x4.8 mm) |
| Megapixels | 18 MP | 16 MP |
| Max ISO | 12800 (boosted) | 12800 (boosted) |
| AF Points | 9-point phase-detect | Contrast detect (unknown no.) |
| Continuous Shooting | 3 fps | 11 fps |
| Video Recording | 1080p30, 720p60 | 1080p30 |
| Lens Mount | Canon EF/EF-S (interchangeable) | Fixed 25-500 mm zoom |
| Weight | 485 g | 234 g |
| Battery Life | ~500 shots | Unknown |
| Wireless Features | Wi-Fi + NFC | None |
| Price (approx.) | $549 | $445 |
Final Image to Reflect Practical Outcomes: The Gallery of Real Shots
Notice the Canon T6’s finesse in rendering texture and dynamic range compared to the Fuji’s lively but less refined output.
In conclusion, both cameras can serve meaningful photographic purposes, but your choice must align with your priorities - image quality and control (Canon EOS T6) or portability and zoom reach (Fujifilm F750EXR).
Happy shooting (no matter which route you choose)!
If you want me to recommend lenses or accessories tailored to either model, just ask - I’ve spent more than 15 years diving deep into gear and would love to help!
Canon T6 vs Fujifilm F750EXR Specifications
| Canon EOS T6 | Fujifilm FinePix F750EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model | Canon EOS T6 | Fujifilm FinePix F750EXR |
| Also Known as | EOS Rebel 1300D | - |
| Type | Entry-Level DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2016-03-10 | 2012-01-05 |
| Physical type | Compact SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Digic 4+ | EXR |
| Sensor type | CMOS | EXRCMOS |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2" |
| Sensor dimensions | 22.3 x 14.9mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
| Sensor area | 332.3mm² | 30.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 18MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5184 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Canon EF/EF-S | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.3 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Number of lenses | 326 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 5.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.5x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | 11.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 9.20 m (at ISO 100) | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | 1/200 secs | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 485 gr (1.07 lbs) | 234 gr (0.52 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 129 x 101 x 78mm (5.1" x 4.0" x 3.1") | 105 x 63 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 66 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 22.0 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 11.7 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 781 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LP-E10 | NP-50A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $549 | $445 |