Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Pentax Q
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
93 Imaging
35 Features
47 Overall
39
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Pentax Q Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 180g - 98 x 57 x 31mm
- Launched June 2011
- Later Model is Pentax Q10
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Pentax Q Overview
Following is a complete assessment of the Pentax WG-2 GPS and Pentax Q, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and both of them are built by Pentax. There exists a huge gap between the image resolutions of the WG-2 GPS (16MP) and Q (12MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe WG-2 GPS was introduced 8 months after the Q and they are of a similar generation. Both cameras feature different body design with the Pentax WG-2 GPS being a Compact camera and the Pentax Q being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the WG-2 GPS scores against the Q when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Pentax Q Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS and Pentax Q. The whole galleries are provided at Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery and Pentax Q Gallery.
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Pentax Q
| WG-2 GPS | Q | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2012 |  | June 2011 | More modern by 8 months |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
| Q | WG-2 GPS |
|---|
Common features in the Pentax WG-2 GPS and Pentax Q
| WG-2 GPS | Q | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display sizing |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Pentax Q Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Pentax WG-2 GPS offers outer measurements of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs) whilst the Pentax Q has proportions of 98mm x 57mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
Check out the Pentax WG-2 GPS and Pentax Q in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at that moment. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the WG-2 GPS vs the Q.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-2 GPS and Q is 91 and 93 respectively.
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Pentax Q Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading technical specs. The pic below might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-2 GPS and Q.
As you have seen, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Pentax WG-2 GPS to offer you greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics way more aggressively. The fresher WG-2 GPS should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Pentax Q Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Pentax WG-2 GPS vs Pentax Q Specifications
| Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | Pentax Q | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Pentax | Pentax |
| Model | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | Pentax Q |
| Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2012-02-07 | 2011-06-23 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 125 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax Q |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.5 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 8 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.40 m | 5.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Trailing-curtain sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/2000s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 198 grams (0.44 lbs) | 180 grams (0.40 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 98 x 57 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 47 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.1 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 189 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 260 pictures | 230 pictures |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | D-LI92 | D-LI68 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $300 | $695 |