Canon Elph 115 IS vs Fujifilm Z900EXR
Portability
96 Imaging
40 Features
35 Overall
38
96 Imaging
40 Features
35 Overall
38
Portability
95 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
95 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Canon Elph 115 IS vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Key Specs
Canon Elph 115 IS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.7-5.9) lens
- 135g - 93 x 57 x 20mm
- Released January 2013
- Other Name is IXUS 132 HS
Fujifilm Z900EXR
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 151g - 101 x 59 x 18mm
- Released April 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon Elph 115 IS vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Canon Elph 115 IS vs Fujifilm Z900EXR, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Canon and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the Elph 115 IS (16MP) and the Fujifilm Z900EXR (16MP) is fairly close but the Elph 115 IS (1/2.3") and Fujifilm Z900EXR (1/2") come with different sensor dimensions.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Elph 115 IS was brought out 23 months after the Fujifilm Z900EXR making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a short overview of how the Elph 115 IS matches up vs the Fujifilm Z900EXR when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Canon Elph 115 IS vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon Elph 115 IS & Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR. The entire galleries are available at Canon Elph 115 IS Gallery & Fujifilm Z900EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon Elph 115 IS over the Fujifilm Z900EXR
| Elph 115 IS | Fujifilm Z900EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | April 2011 | More modern by 23 months |
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z900EXR over the Canon Elph 115 IS
| Fujifilm Z900EXR | Elph 115 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial exact focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Canon Elph 115 IS and Fujifilm Z900EXR
| Elph 115 IS | Fujifilm Z900EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Canon Elph 115 IS vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry around your camera often, you should think about its weight and size. The Canon Elph 115 IS has physical measurements of 93mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm Z900EXR has specifications of 101mm x 59mm x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Compare the Canon Elph 115 IS vs Fujifilm Z900EXR in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the Elph 115 IS versus the Fujifilm Z900EXR.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the Elph 115 IS and Fujifilm Z900EXR is 96 and 95 respectively.
Canon Elph 115 IS vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor sizes merely by viewing specifications. The image underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the Elph 115 IS and Fujifilm Z900EXR.
To sum up, both of the cameras offer the same exact MP but different sensor sizes. The Elph 115 IS has got the smaller sensor which is going to make getting shallower depth of field trickier. The newer Elph 115 IS provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon Elph 115 IS vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Canon Elph 115 IS as a Portrait photography camera
Fujifilm Z900EXR as a Portrait photography camera
good resolution (16MP)
includes face detection focus
focusing manually not possible
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
manual focus
good MP (16MP)
has face detection focusing
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2")
lack of RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Canon Elph 115 IS Street photography information
Fujifilm Z900EXR Street photography information
built in image stabilization (Optical)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has focus by touch
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2")
lack of RAW files
heavier than others (151 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sports photography with Canon Elph 115 IS
Sports photography with Fujifilm Z900EXR
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
includes tracking autofocus
slow frames per second (2.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery life (170 per charge)
does not have phase detect auto focus
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
has tracking autofocus
max fps very slow (3.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
sensor size is very small (1/2")
lack of phase detect AF
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Canon Elph 115 IS
Travel photography with Fujifilm Z900EXR
good resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
bad battery life (170 per charge)
does not offer selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f2.7)
has focus by touch
good MP (16MP)
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than others (151g)
does not have selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Canon Elph 115 IS Landscape photography features
Fujifilm Z900EXR Landscape photography features
fairly wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
good resolution (16MP)
focusing manually not possible
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.7)
manual mode not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
bad battery life (170 shots)
missing Time Lapse mode
manual focus
fairly wide (28mm)
screen larger than average (3.5 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
sensor size is very small (1/2")
lack of RAW files
missing Time Lapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Canon Elph 115 IS
Vlogging with Fujifilm Z900EXR
fairly wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow max aperture (f2.7)
does not offer selfie friendly display
missing external mic support
fairly wide (28mm)
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
does not have selfie friendly display
missing external mic port
heavier than others (151 grams)
Photography Glossary
Canon Elph 115 IS vs Fujifilm Z900EXR Specifications
| Canon Elph 115 IS | Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model | Canon Elph 115 IS | Fujifilm FinePix Z900EXR |
| Also called | IXUS 132 HS | - |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Released | 2013-01-29 | 2011-04-05 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 5 | EXR |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | EXRCMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | 1 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.7-5.9 | f/3.9-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.6 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | PureColor II G TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 135 gr (0.30 lb) | 151 gr (0.33 lb) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 57 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 101 x 59 x 18mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 170 pictures | 220 pictures |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-11L | NP-45A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Couple, Group, Auto-shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $225 | $380 |
