Canon Elph 115 IS vs Kodak M320
96 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
95 Imaging
32 Features
10 Overall
23
Canon Elph 115 IS vs Kodak M320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.7-5.9) lens
- 135g - 93 x 57 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2013
- Also referred to as IXUS 132 HS
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Released January 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon Elph 115 IS vs Kodak M320 Overview
Following is a in depth comparison of the Canon Elph 115 IS vs Kodak M320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Canon and Kodak. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the Elph 115 IS (16MP) and M320 (9MP) and the Elph 115 IS (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") use totally different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe Elph 115 IS was announced 4 years after the M320 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving through a thorough comparison, below is a short introduction of how the Elph 115 IS matches up against the M320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon Elph 115 IS vs Kodak M320 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon Elph 115 IS & Kodak EasyShare M320. The whole galleries are provided at Canon Elph 115 IS Gallery & Kodak M320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon Elph 115 IS over the Kodak M320
| Elph 115 IS | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 50 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Canon Elph 115 IS
| M320 | Elph 115 IS |
|---|
Common features in the Canon Elph 115 IS and Kodak M320
| Elph 115 IS | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Canon Elph 115 IS vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon Elph 115 IS comes with external measurements of 93mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Kodak M320 has dimensions of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Canon Elph 115 IS vs Kodak M320 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the Elph 115 IS versus the M320.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the Elph 115 IS and M320 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Canon Elph 115 IS vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to envision the difference between sensor sizes purely by looking at a spec sheet. The picture here might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Elph 115 IS and M320.
As you can see, both of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The Elph 115 IS having a bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Canon Elph 115 IS will give greater detail with its extra 7MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop shots a little more aggressively. The fresher Elph 115 IS will have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon Elph 115 IS vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Canon Elph 115 IS vs Kodak M320 Specifications
| Canon Elph 115 IS | Kodak EasyShare M320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Kodak |
| Model | Canon Elph 115 IS | Kodak EasyShare M320 |
| Also called as | IXUS 132 HS | - |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2013-01-29 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 5 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3472 x 2604 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 25 |
| Cross focus points | 1 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 34-102mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.7-5.9 | f/2.8-5.1 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | PureColor II G TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1400 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (24 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 320 x 240 (240 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 135 grams (0.30 pounds) | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 57 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 170 shots | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-11L | KLIC-7001 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $225 | $39 |