Canon IXUS 165 vs Casio EX-Z35
96 Imaging
45 Features
26 Overall
37
![Canon IXUS 165 front Canon IXUS 165 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Canon-IXUS-165/Canon-IXUS-165-front.jpg)
![Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35/Casio-EX-Z35-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Canon IXUS 165 vs Casio EX-Z35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
- 128g - 95 x 54 x 22mm
- Launched January 2015
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Released February 2010
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Canon IXUS 165 vs Casio EX-Z35 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Canon IXUS 165 and Casio EX-Z35, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Canon and Casio. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the IXUS 165 (20MP) and EX-Z35 (12MP) but they feature the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
The IXUS 165 was revealed 4 years after the EX-Z35 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the IXUS 165 scores vs the EX-Z35 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Canon IXUS 165 vs Casio EX-Z35 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon IXUS 165 & Casio Exilim EX-Z35. The full galleries are available at Canon IXUS 165 Gallery & Casio EX-Z35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon IXUS 165 over the Casio EX-Z35
IXUS 165 | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2015 | ![]() | February 2010 | Newer by 60 months |
Display dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Canon IXUS 165
EX-Z35 | IXUS 165 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus |
Common features in the Canon IXUS 165 and Casio EX-Z35
IXUS 165 | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Canon IXUS 165 vs Casio EX-Z35 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and volume. The Canon IXUS 165 provides physical measurements of 95mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") having a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Casio EX-Z35 has sizing of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs).
Analyze the Canon IXUS 165 and Casio EX-Z35 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using at that time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the IXUS 165 vs the EX-Z35.
![Canon IXUS 165 vs Casio EX-Z35 size comparison Canon IXUS 165 vs Casio EX-Z35 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-IXUS-165-vs-Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the IXUS 165 and EX-Z35 is 96 and 96 respectively.
![Canon IXUS 165 vs Casio EX-Z35 top view buttons comparison Canon IXUS 165 vs Casio EX-Z35 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-IXUS-165-vs-Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Canon IXUS 165 vs Casio EX-Z35 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading a spec sheet. The image underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the IXUS 165 and EX-Z35.
Clearly, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the Canon IXUS 165 to deliver extra detail because of its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The younger IXUS 165 is going to have an advantage in sensor technology.
![Canon IXUS 165 vs Casio EX-Z35 sensor size comparison Canon IXUS 165 vs Casio EX-Z35 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Canon-IXUS-165-vs-Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Canon IXUS 165 vs Casio EX-Z35 Screen and ViewFinder
![Canon IXUS 165 vs Casio EX-Z35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon IXUS 165 vs Casio EX-Z35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-IXUS-165-vs-Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Canon IXUS 165 vs Casio EX-Z35 Specifications
Canon IXUS 165 | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Canon | Casio |
Model type | Canon IXUS 165 | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2015-01-06 | 2010-02-21 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | DIGIC 4+ | Exilim Engine 5.0 |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5152 x 3864 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 36-107mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-6.9 | f/3.1-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7" | 2.5" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 0.8fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 128 gr (0.28 pounds) | 124 gr (0.27 pounds) |
Dimensions | 95 x 54 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NB-11L/LH | NP-82 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $0 | $99 |