Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M320
96 Imaging
45 Features
26 Overall
37
95 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
- 128g - 95 x 54 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2015
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced January 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M320 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M320, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Canon and Kodak. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the IXUS 165 (20MP) and M320 (9MP) and the IXUS 165 (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") boast different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe IXUS 165 was brought out 6 years later than the M320 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the IXUS 165 matches up versus the M320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon IXUS 165 & Kodak EasyShare M320. The entire galleries are provided at Canon IXUS 165 Gallery & Kodak M320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon IXUS 165 over the Kodak M320
| IXUS 165 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2015 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 73 months |
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Canon IXUS 165
| M320 | IXUS 165 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon IXUS 165 and Kodak M320
| IXUS 165 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Same screen dimensions |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon IXUS 165 comes with outer measurements of 95mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Kodak M320 has measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M320 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the IXUS 165 versus the M320.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the IXUS 165 and M320 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to picture the contrast in sensor measurements merely by looking through specs. The graphic below might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the IXUS 165 and M320.
All in all, both of those cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The IXUS 165 because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Canon IXUS 165 will result in more detail having its extra 11MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The fresher IXUS 165 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M320 Specifications
| Canon IXUS 165 | Kodak EasyShare M320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Kodak |
| Model type | Canon IXUS 165 | Kodak EasyShare M320 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2015-01-06 | 2009-01-08 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | DIGIC 4+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20MP | 9MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5152 x 3864 | 3472 x 2604 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-224mm (8.0x) | 34-102mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.2-6.9 | f/2.8-5.1 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1400s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 0.8 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, on, off, slow synchro | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 128g (0.28 lb) | 155g (0.34 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 54 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-11L/LH | KLIC-7001 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $0 | $39 |