Clicky

Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M320

Portability
96
Imaging
46
Features
26
Overall
38
Canon IXUS 165 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M320 front
Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
10
Overall
23

Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M320 Key Specs

Canon IXUS 165
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-224mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
  • 128g - 95 x 54 x 22mm
  • Revealed January 2015
Kodak M320
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
  • Introduced January 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M320 Overview

Its time to take a closer look at the Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M320, both Ultracompact cameras by competitors Canon and Kodak. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the IXUS 165 (20MP) and M320 (9MP) and the IXUS 165 (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") boast different sensor sizes.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The IXUS 165 was brought out 6 years later than the M320 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before diving right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick overview of how the IXUS 165 matches up versus the M320 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon IXUS 165 over the Kodak M320

 IXUS 165 M320 
IntroducedJanuary 2015January 2009More recent by 73 months

Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Canon IXUS 165

 M320 IXUS 165 

Common features in the Canon IXUS 165 and Kodak M320

 IXUS 165 M320 
Focus manually No manual focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size2.7"2.7"Same screen dimensions
Screen resolution230k230kThe same screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch friendly screen No Touch friendly screen

Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to lug around your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Canon IXUS 165 comes with outer measurements of 95mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Kodak M320 has measurements of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Take a look at the Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M320 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is a front view overall size comparison of the IXUS 165 versus the M320.

Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M320 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the IXUS 165 and M320 is 96 and 95 respectively.

Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M320 top view buttons comparison

Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison

Normally, its tough to picture the contrast in sensor measurements merely by looking through specs. The graphic below might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the IXUS 165 and M320.

All in all, both of those cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The IXUS 165 because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF less difficult and the Canon IXUS 165 will result in more detail having its extra 11MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures way more aggressively. The fresher IXUS 165 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.

Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M320 sensor size comparison

Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon IXUS 165 Portrait photography information
Kodak M320 Portrait photography information
39
MP count decent (20 megapixels)
provides face detect autofocus
no manual focus
manual mode not available
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
19
no manual focus
no manual exposure
can't use external flash
low resolution sensor (9 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
does not have RAW support
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Canon IXUS 165 Street photography info
Kodak M320 Street photography info
59
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
47
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
does not have RAW support
more heavy than others in class (155 grams)
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segments

Sports Comparison

Canon IXUS 165 Sports photography details
Kodak M320 Sports photography details
44
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20MP)
provides tracking focus
max frames per second low (0.8 frames/s)
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
16
low max shutter speed (1/1,400s)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (9 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Canon IXUS 165 Travel photography features
Kodak M320 Travel photography features
67
MP count decent (20MP)
has built in flash
rather wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
50
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than others in class (155g)
low resolution sensor (9 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly screen
wide angle not the best (34mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Landscape Comparison

Canon IXUS 165 Landscape photography information
Kodak M320 Landscape photography information
41
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (20MP)
no manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
small screen (2.7 inch)
manual mode not available
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
doesn't have Timelapse function
22
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (34mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
no manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (9MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.5")
does not have RAW support
lack of Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Canon IXUS 165 Vlogging factors
Kodak M320 Vlogging factors
32
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detect autofocus
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have microphone support
22
wide angle not the best (34mm)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
does not have selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external microphone port
more heavy than others in class (155 grams)
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observations

Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon IXUS 165 and Kodak M320
 Canon IXUS 165Kodak EasyShare M320
General Information
Make Canon Kodak
Model type Canon IXUS 165 Kodak EasyShare M320
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Revealed 2015-01-06 2009-01-08
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by DIGIC 4+ -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.5"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 5.744 x 4.308mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 24.7mm²
Sensor resolution 20MP 9MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 5152 x 3864 3472 x 2604
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 9 25
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-224mm (8.0x) 34-102mm (3.0x)
Max aperture f/3.2-6.9 f/2.8-5.1
Macro focusing distance 1cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 6.3
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 2.7 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 15s 4s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1400s
Continuous shutter speed 0.8 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, on, off, slow synchro Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30p) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 128g (0.28 lb) 155g (0.34 lb)
Physical dimensions 95 x 54 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 220 photographs -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID NB-11L/LH KLIC-7001
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC card SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $0 $39