Clicky

Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M380

Portability
96
Imaging
45
Features
26
Overall
37
Canon IXUS 165 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M380 front
Portability
95
Imaging
32
Features
13
Overall
24

Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M380 Key Specs

Canon IXUS 165
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-224mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
  • 128g - 95 x 54 x 22mm
  • Revealed January 2015
Kodak M380
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 38-190mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 155g - 100 x 60 x 20mm
  • Released January 2009
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M380 Overview

Let's look more in depth at the Canon IXUS 165 and Kodak M380, both Ultracompact cameras by manufacturers Canon and Kodak. There is a large difference among the sensor resolutions of the IXUS 165 (20MP) and M380 (10MP) but both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The IXUS 165 was introduced 6 years later than the M380 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before going into a complete comparison, here is a simple summation of how the IXUS 165 grades against the M380 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Canon IXUS 165 over the Kodak M380

 IXUS 165 M380 
ReleasedJanuary 2015January 2009Fresher by 73 months

Reasons to pick Kodak M380 over the Canon IXUS 165

 M380 IXUS 165 
Display dimensions3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")

Common features in the Canon IXUS 165 and Kodak M380

 IXUS 165 M380 
Focus manually Lack of manual focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kThe same display resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch display Lacking Touch display

Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M380 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon IXUS 165 has outer dimensions of 95mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Kodak M380 has dimensions of 100mm x 60mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Compare the Canon IXUS 165 and Kodak M380 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the IXUS 165 versus the M380.

Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M380 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the IXUS 165 and M380 is 96 and 95 respectively.

Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M380 top view buttons comparison

Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M380 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its hard to envision the gap in sensor sizing only by going through technical specs. The graphic underneath may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the IXUS 165 and M380.

As you have seen, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Canon IXUS 165 to show greater detail using its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The more modern IXUS 165 will have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M380 sensor size comparison

Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M380 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M380 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon IXUS 165 as a Portrait photography camera
Kodak M380 as a Portrait photography camera
38
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
offers face detect focus
lack of manual focus
no manual exposure
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
19
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Canon IXUS 165 as a Street photography camera
Kodak M380 as a Street photography camera
59
has image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
47
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
more heavy than competition in class (155 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Canon IXUS 165 Sports photography factors
Kodak M380 Sports photography factors
43
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
slow fps (0.8 frames per second)
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
16
max shutter speed is low (1/1,448 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Canon IXUS 165 Travel photography factors
Kodak M380 Travel photography factors
67
sensor resolution is decent (20 megapixels)
flash built-in
rather wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse recording
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
50
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse recording
more heavy than competition in class (155g)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (38mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Canon IXUS 165
Landscape photography with Kodak M380
41
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor resolution is decent (20MP)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
no manual exposure
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
no Time Lapse recording
26
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (38mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
manual mode not possible
no image stabilization
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Canon IXUS 165 as a Vlogging camera
Kodak M380 as a Vlogging camera
32
rather wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detect focus
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
no mic socket
22
wide angle not great (38mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have microphone jack
more heavy than competition in class (155 grams)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Canon IXUS 165 vs Kodak M380 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon IXUS 165 and Kodak M380
 Canon IXUS 165Kodak EasyShare M380
General Information
Make Canon Kodak
Model Canon IXUS 165 Kodak EasyShare M380
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Revealed 2015-01-06 2009-01-08
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor DIGIC 4+ -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 5152 x 3864 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 1600 1600
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 9 25
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-224mm (8.0x) 38-190mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.2-6.9 f/3.1-5.6
Macro focus range 1cm 10cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 15 secs 4 secs
Max shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/1448 secs
Continuous shutter speed 0.8fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.00 m 2.50 m
Flash settings Auto, on, off, slow synchro Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30p) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 128g (0.28 pounds) 155g (0.34 pounds)
Physical dimensions 95 x 54 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") 100 x 60 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 220 shots -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model NB-11L/LH KLIC-7003
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC card SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $0 $160