Clicky

Canon IXUS 165 vs Sony W320

Portability
96
Imaging
46
Features
26
Overall
38
Canon IXUS 165 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320 front
Portability
97
Imaging
37
Features
21
Overall
30

Canon IXUS 165 vs Sony W320 Key Specs

Canon IXUS 165
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-224mm (F3.2-6.9) lens
  • 128g - 95 x 54 x 22mm
  • Revealed January 2015
Sony W320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
  • 117g - 93 x 52 x 17mm
  • Announced January 2010
Photography Glossary

Canon IXUS 165 vs Sony W320 Overview

Following is a complete review of the Canon IXUS 165 versus Sony W320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by competitors Canon and Sony. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the IXUS 165 (20MP) and W320 (14MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The IXUS 165 was launched 5 years after the W320 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the IXUS 165 matches up against the W320 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon IXUS 165 over the Sony W320

 IXUS 165 W320 
AnnouncedJanuary 2015January 2010More modern by 61 months

Reasons to pick Sony W320 over the Canon IXUS 165

 W320 IXUS 165 

Common features in the Canon IXUS 165 and Sony W320

 IXUS 165 W320 
Manually focus Lack of manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size2.7"2.7"Same display measurement
Display resolution230k230kEqual display resolution
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Canon IXUS 165 vs Sony W320 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon IXUS 165 has got physical dimensions of 95mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Sony W320 has dimensions of 93mm x 52mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7") having a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).

Check the Canon IXUS 165 versus Sony W320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view size comparison of the IXUS 165 vs the W320.

Canon IXUS 165 vs Sony W320 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the IXUS 165 and W320 is 96 and 97 respectively.

Canon IXUS 165 vs Sony W320 top view buttons comparison

Canon IXUS 165 vs Sony W320 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes just by reading through specifications. The picture below should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the IXUS 165 and W320.

Plainly, both of those cameras come with the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Canon IXUS 165 to give greater detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more recent IXUS 165 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Canon IXUS 165 vs Sony W320 sensor size comparison

Canon IXUS 165 vs Sony W320 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon IXUS 165 vs Sony W320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon IXUS 165 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony W320 as a Portrait photography camera
39
good MP (20MP)
features face detect focus
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
28
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
no manual focus
lack of manual exposure
no external flash support
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Canon IXUS 165
Street photography with Sony W320
59
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
49
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Canon IXUS 165 as a Sports photography camera
Sony W320 as a Sports photography camera
44
has image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (20 megapixels)
features tracking focus
continuous shooting slow (0.8 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
26
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
slow fps (1.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Canon IXUS 165 Travel photography features
Sony W320 Travel photography features
67
good MP (20 megapixels)
built-in flash
relatively wide (28mm)
does not have Time Lapse mode
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
66
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
built-in flash
reasonably wide (26mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Canon IXUS 165 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony W320 as a Landscape photography camera
41
relatively wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (20 megapixels)
no manual focus
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen is small (2.7")
manual exposure not available
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
does not have Time Lapse mode
33
reasonably wide (26mm)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
screen is small (2.7 inches)
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
lack of Timelapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Canon IXUS 165
Vlogging with Sony W320
32
relatively wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect focus
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have mic socket
26
reasonably wide (26mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.7)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of microphone socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Canon IXUS 165 vs Sony W320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon IXUS 165 and Sony W320
 Canon IXUS 165Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
General Information
Make Canon Sony
Model Canon IXUS 165 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W320
Category Ultracompact Ultracompact
Revealed 2015-01-06 2010-01-07
Physical type Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip DIGIC 4+ -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 20 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 5152 x 3864 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-224mm (8.0x) 26-105mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture f/3.2-6.9 f/2.7-5.7
Macro focus distance 1cm 4cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15 seconds 1 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1600 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 0.8 frames/s 1.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.00 m 4.80 m
Flash settings Auto, on, off, slow synchro Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (25p), 640 x 480 (30p) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 128 grams (0.28 pounds) 117 grams (0.26 pounds)
Physical dimensions 95 x 54 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.9") 93 x 52 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 220 shots -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model NB-11L/LH NP-BN1
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) Yes (2 sec or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC card SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Launch price $0 $269