Canon A1200 vs Olympus TG-320
92 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/72908/7290819232d1a144154d6b65fbbd5604a5a4a580" alt="Canon PowerShot A1200 front Canon PowerShot A1200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3ced/f3cedb69b934f7169f253825ad9ca28abd57cd22" alt="Olympus TG-320 front Olympus TG-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Canon A1200 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 185g - 98 x 63 x 31mm
- Released January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Launched January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Canon A1200 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Here, we are matching up the Canon A1200 vs Olympus TG-320, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the A1200 (12MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is fairly similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The A1200 was released 12 months earlier than the TG-320 so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the A1200 scores versus the TG-320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon A1200 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot A1200 & Olympus TG-320. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon A1200 Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A1200 over the Olympus TG-320
A1200 | TG-320 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Canon A1200
TG-320 | A1200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | ![]() | January 2011 | Newer by 12 months |
Common features in the Canon A1200 and Olympus TG-320
A1200 | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Same display measurement |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch display |
Canon A1200 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Canon A1200 features exterior measurements of 98mm x 63mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Compare the Canon A1200 vs Olympus TG-320 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the A1200 compared to the TG-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dd9e2/dd9e2a37b352eda0a9bfaa8349cc5a8f544048c8" alt="Canon A1200 vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison Canon A1200 vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the A1200 and TG-320 is 92 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bf27f/bf27f33b06c564170a431d018c04a6c16b638d4c" alt="Canon A1200 vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison Canon A1200 vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison"
Canon A1200 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reading specifications. The image here will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the A1200 and TG-320.
Plainly, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You can anticipate the Olympus TG-320 to offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics way more aggressively. The more aged A1200 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/055da/055da85035be2c5a531f8c26304e9a9040c464db" alt="Canon A1200 vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison Canon A1200 vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison"
Canon A1200 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c62ce/c62cef227d18c9de86b635b27a52c71a8a3e36c1" alt="Canon A1200 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon A1200 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Canon A1200 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
Canon PowerShot A1200 | Olympus TG-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon PowerShot A1200 | Olympus TG-320 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2011-01-05 | 2012-01-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (tunnel) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 5.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 185 gr (0.41 pounds) | 155 gr (0.34 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 63 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 1.2") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 images | 150 images |
Battery type | AA | Battery Pack |
Battery model | 2 x AA | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HCMMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $109 | $0 |