Canon A1200 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
92 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Canon A1200 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 185g - 98 x 63 x 31mm
- Launched January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
Photography Glossary Canon A1200 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
The following is a complete review of the Canon A1200 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the A1200 (12MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras have the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe A1200 was announced 13 months earlier than the TG-820 iHS making them a generation away from each other. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise view of how the A1200 scores against the TG-820 iHS when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon A1200 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot A1200 and Olympus TG-820 iHS. The whole galleries are available at Canon A1200 Gallery and Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A1200 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| A1200 | TG-820 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Canon A1200
| TG-820 iHS | A1200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2012 | January 2011 | Newer by 13 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 1030k | 230k | Clearer display (+800k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A1200 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| A1200 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | No manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Canon A1200 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera, you have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Canon A1200 has physical measurements of 98mm x 63mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) while the Olympus TG-820 iHS has dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Analyze the Canon A1200 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the A1200 vs the TG-820 iHS.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the A1200 and TG-820 iHS is 92 and 92 respectively.
Canon A1200 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is hard to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions just by going through technical specs. The image here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the A1200 and TG-820 iHS.
As you can tell, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the exact same megapixels and you should expect comparable quality of files but you should really consider the release date of the cameras into account. The more aged A1200 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon A1200 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Canon A1200 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A1200 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A1200 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2012-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,030 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (tunnel) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 185 grams (0.41 lb) | 206 grams (0.45 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 63 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 1.2") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 images | 220 images |
| Form of battery | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HCMMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $109 | $500 |