Canon A1200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
92 Imaging
35 Features
19 Overall
28
90 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
Canon A1200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 185g - 98 x 63 x 31mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Previous Model is Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- New Model is Ricoh WG-6
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon A1200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Canon A1200 versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Ricoh. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the A1200 (12MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe A1200 was launched 5 years before the WG-5 GPS which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the A1200 matches up vs the WG-5 GPS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon A1200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot A1200 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The complete galleries are available at Canon A1200 Gallery and Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A1200 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| A1200 | WG-5 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Canon A1200
| WG-5 GPS | A1200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2015 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 49 months |
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A1200 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| A1200 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Canon A1200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera, you should consider its weight and proportions. The Canon A1200 provides exterior dimensions of 98mm x 63mm x 31mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 1.2") having a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has measurements of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon A1200 versus Ricoh WG-5 GPS in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the A1200 and the WG-5 GPS.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the A1200 and WG-5 GPS is 92 and 90 respectively.
Canon A1200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor dimensions purely by checking out a spec sheet. The image here will provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the A1200 and WG-5 GPS.
Clearly, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to provide greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The more aged A1200 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon A1200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon A1200 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A1200 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A1200 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2015-02-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (tunnel) | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | 14.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 185g (0.41 lb) | 236g (0.52 lb) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 63 x 31mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 1.2") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 200 images | 240 images |
| Battery style | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HCMMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $109 | $500 |
