Canon A1300 vs Olympus VR-320
93 Imaging
39 Features
23 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54e09/54e09043b6d350324cfa8573773a1b81c496eb72" alt="Canon PowerShot A1300 front Canon PowerShot A1300 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Canon A1300 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 174g - 95 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- Updated by Olympus VR-330
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Canon A1300 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
Here is a comprehensive comparison of the Canon A1300 versus Olympus VR-320, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the A1300 (16MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is very comparable and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The A1300 was unveiled 7 months later than the VR-320 and they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a full comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the A1300 grades versus the VR-320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Canon A1300 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot A1300 and Olympus VR-320. The full galleries are provided at Canon A1300 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A1300 over the Olympus VR-320
A1300 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2012 | ![]() | July 2011 | Fresher by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Canon A1300
VR-320 | A1300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Canon A1300 and Olympus VR-320
A1300 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Canon A1300 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Canon A1300 enjoys physical dimensions of 95mm x 62mm x 30mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-320 has measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Canon A1300 versus Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the A1300 compared to the VR-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9076/b907621718500ee128ee792a1c4d20661a246073" alt="Canon A1300 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison Canon A1300 vs Olympus VR-320 size comparison"
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the A1300 and VR-320 is 93 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7f13/f7f1347bcec3bd3b0c4f928516c2f338224cca64" alt="Canon A1300 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison Canon A1300 vs Olympus VR-320 top view buttons comparison"
Canon A1300 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to picture the contrast in sensor sizing merely by going through technical specs. The photograph underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the A1300 and VR-320.
As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should expect to see the Canon A1300 to show extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The fresher A1300 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df239/df239f09e4a74ae907d92abd48543784630121ca" alt="Canon A1300 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison Canon A1300 vs Olympus VR-320 sensor size comparison"
Canon A1300 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f149/6f1499a43aa1d884b331c5fd1b9fbc6999b3aaa0" alt="Canon A1300 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon A1300 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Canon A1300 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
Canon PowerShot A1300 | Olympus VR-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Olympus |
Model type | Canon PowerShot A1300 | Olympus VR-320 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2012-02-07 | 2011-07-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (tunnel) | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 174 gr (0.38 lb) | 158 gr (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 95 x 62 x 30mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photographs | - |
Battery form | AA | - |
Battery ID | 2 x AA | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $119 | $179 |