Canon A2100 IS vs Olympus Tough-3000
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee587/ee58786e6f42f8d08ceb5edfea547f9dc50d67f3" alt="Canon PowerShot A2100 IS front Canon PowerShot A2100 IS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/65bd8/65bd8807760d1aa9ce571a27b6fa183cf36228ef" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 front"
94 Imaging
35 Features
26 Overall
31
Canon A2100 IS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-216mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 185g - 102 x 64 x 32mm
- Revealed February 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 159g - 96 x 65 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Additionally Known as mju Tough 3000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon A2100 IS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Overview
Here is a extended overview of the Canon A2100 IS and Olympus Tough-3000, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the A2100 IS (12MP) and the Tough-3000 (12MP) is relatively well matched and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The A2100 IS was unveiled 10 months before the Tough-3000 and they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the A2100 IS scores vs the Tough-3000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Canon A2100 IS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot A2100 IS and Olympus Stylus Tough-3000. The full galleries are provided at Canon A2100 IS Gallery and Olympus Tough-3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A2100 IS over the Olympus Tough-3000
A2100 IS | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus Tough-3000 over the Canon A2100 IS
Tough-3000 | A2100 IS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2010 | ![]() | February 2009 | Fresher by 10 months |
Common features in the Canon A2100 IS and Olympus Tough-3000
A2100 IS | Tough-3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Canon A2100 IS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Canon A2100 IS features outside dimensions of 102mm x 64mm x 32mm (4.0" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) and the Olympus Tough-3000 has measurements of 96mm x 65mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 159 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Canon A2100 IS and Olympus Tough-3000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the A2100 IS against the Tough-3000.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9eb28/9eb283b3829fc3f82f88cb54fecbdc0ecbf419b1" alt="Canon A2100 IS vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison Canon A2100 IS vs Olympus Tough-3000 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the A2100 IS and Tough-3000 is 92 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78e54/78e548b249b88358fb475e636f8dbd1cf01a8df0" alt="Canon A2100 IS vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison Canon A2100 IS vs Olympus Tough-3000 top view buttons comparison"
Canon A2100 IS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizing only by looking at technical specs. The graphic underneath should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the A2100 IS and Tough-3000.
As you have seen, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact megapixels and you should expect similar quality of files although you should consider the production date of the products into consideration. The older A2100 IS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b27ad/b27adea8a60e5ddec05cdaceed974283390eecbf" alt="Canon A2100 IS vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison Canon A2100 IS vs Olympus Tough-3000 sensor size comparison"
Canon A2100 IS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e4bd/6e4bd9a8b8d7629645b9ea04856d0d6233cf0ec8" alt="Canon A2100 IS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon A2100 IS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Canon A2100 IS vs Olympus Tough-3000 Specifications
Canon PowerShot A2100 IS | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Olympus |
Model type | Canon PowerShot A2100 IS | Olympus Stylus Tough-3000 |
Also Known as | - | mju Tough 3000 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2009-02-18 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-216mm (6.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 2cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 185 gr (0.41 pounds) | 159 gr (0.35 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 64 x 32mm (4.0" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 96 x 65 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | 2 x AA | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 10, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/HD MMCplus | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $220 | $0 |