Canon A2100 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
85 Imaging
36 Features
67 Overall
48
Canon A2100 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-216mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 185g - 102 x 64 x 32mm
- Launched February 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Announced December 2012
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon A2100 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Canon A2100 IS and Olympus XZ-2 iHS, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the A2100 IS (12MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is pretty similar but the A2100 IS (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe A2100 IS was manufactured 4 years before the XZ-2 iHS and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the A2100 IS scores against the XZ-2 iHS in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon A2100 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot A2100 IS & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon A2100 IS Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A2100 IS over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| A2100 IS | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Canon A2100 IS
| XZ-2 iHS | A2100 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | December 2012 | February 2009 | Fresher by 46 months | |
| Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Canon A2100 IS and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| A2100 IS | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Canon A2100 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Canon A2100 IS provides outside dimensions of 102mm x 64mm x 32mm (4.0" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has proportions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") and a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Check out the Canon A2100 IS and Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the A2100 IS compared to the XZ-2 iHS.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A2100 IS and XZ-2 iHS is 92 and 85 respectively.
Canon A2100 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reviewing technical specs. The photograph underneath should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the A2100 IS and XZ-2 iHS.
As you can tell, the two cameras provide the same megapixels albeit not the same sensor sizing. The A2100 IS offers the tinier sensor which is going to make achieving shallower depth of field trickier. The older A2100 IS is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon A2100 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon A2100 IS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A2100 IS | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot A2100 IS | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-02-18 | 2012-12-18 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-216mm (6.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Off | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 185 grams (0.41 lb) | 346 grams (0.76 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 64 x 32mm (4.0" x 2.5" x 1.3") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 pictures |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus/HD MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $220 | $450 |