Canon A2200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8fe9/c8fe9c9d0594e9d7a4f71381b1c62039093f9d0b" alt="Canon PowerShot A2200 front Canon PowerShot A2200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52820/52820934f022876444ce4a7f714bc8a8f3b522b2" alt="Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR front Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR front"
90 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46
Canon A2200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 135g - 93 x 57 x 24mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-500mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 232g - 105 x 61 x 36mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Previous Model is Fujifilm F800EXR
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Canon A2200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Overview
The following is a in depth comparison of the Canon A2200 versus Fujifilm F900EXR, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Canon and FujiFilm. The image resolution of the A2200 (14MP) and the Fujifilm F900EXR (16MP) is relatively well matched but the A2200 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F900EXR (1/2") use totally different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The A2200 was announced 3 years before the Fujifilm F900EXR which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a full comparison, below is a simple view of how the A2200 matches up versus the Fujifilm F900EXR for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Canon A2200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot A2200 & Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR. The whole galleries are available at Canon A2200 Gallery & Fujifilm F900EXR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A2200 over the Fujifilm F900EXR
A2200 | Fujifilm F900EXR |
---|
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F900EXR over the Canon A2200
Fujifilm F900EXR | A2200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2011 | Newer by 25 months |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A2200 and Fujifilm F900EXR
A2200 | Fujifilm F900EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Canon A2200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon A2200 has outside dimensions of 93mm x 57mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm F900EXR has measurements of 105mm x 61mm x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Check the Canon A2200 versus Fujifilm F900EXR in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the A2200 versus the Fujifilm F900EXR.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8346/f83466f42184d5bf13a99f3d3b8e3961c163ba7e" alt="Canon A2200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR size comparison Canon A2200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the A2200 and Fujifilm F900EXR is 95 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f42e/7f42ec007f7e1a2ff95e630b577a9d756730d1b6" alt="Canon A2200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR top view buttons comparison Canon A2200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR top view buttons comparison"
Canon A2200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading through a spec sheet. The picture below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the A2200 and Fujifilm F900EXR.
Clearly, each of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The A2200 having a tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF tougher and the Fujifilm F900EXR will give you greater detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged A2200 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48f4b/48f4ba08330a3859c5f8c64c935100d6a306e711" alt="Canon A2200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR sensor size comparison Canon A2200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR sensor size comparison"
Canon A2200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86254/86254ab92303854c5e91925404115aece307eeec" alt="Canon A2200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon A2200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Canon A2200 vs Fujifilm F900EXR Specifications
Canon PowerShot A2200 | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | FujiFilm |
Model | Canon PowerShot A2200 | Fujifilm FinePix F900EXR |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2013-01-30 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | EXR II |
Sensor type | CCD | EXRCMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.4 x 4.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 30.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 25-500mm (20.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.5-5.3 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.6 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | TFT color LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per second | 11.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 3.70 m (Wide: 15 cm–3.7 m / Tele: 90 cm–2.4m) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 135 gr (0.30 lbs) | 232 gr (0.51 lbs) |
Dimensions | 93 x 57 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 105 x 61 x 36mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 photos | 260 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-8L | NP-50A |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto release, Auto shutter (Dog, Cat)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HCMMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $139 | $380 |