Canon A2200 vs Olympus 6020
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c8fe9/c8fe9c9d0594e9d7a4f71381b1c62039093f9d0b" alt="Canon PowerShot A2200 front Canon PowerShot A2200 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f83bd/f83bdf39352a979ef5fa8b296f80d35d80574119" alt="Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 front"
95 Imaging
36 Features
32 Overall
34
Canon A2200 vs Olympus 6020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 135g - 93 x 57 x 24mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 122g - 95 x 62 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 6020
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Canon A2200 vs Olympus 6020 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Canon A2200 and Olympus 6020, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the A2200 (14MP) and the 6020 (13MP) is pretty similar and both cameras boast the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
The A2200 was released 12 months after the 6020 which means that they are of a similar age. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a short summation of how the A2200 matches up versus the 6020 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Canon A2200 vs Olympus 6020 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot A2200 & Olympus Stylus Tough 6020. The complete galleries are available at Canon A2200 Gallery & Olympus 6020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A2200 over the Olympus 6020
A2200 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2011 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 12 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus 6020 over the Canon A2200
6020 | A2200 |
---|
Common features in the Canon A2200 and Olympus 6020
A2200 | 6020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Equal screen sizing |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Canon A2200 vs Olympus 6020 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Canon A2200 has got physical dimensions of 93mm x 57mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Olympus 6020 has sizing of 95mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Analyze the Canon A2200 and Olympus 6020 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the A2200 compared to the 6020.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6a91b/6a91b229e28f798ba7ec1811ea04b7ca65806472" alt="Canon A2200 vs Olympus 6020 size comparison Canon A2200 vs Olympus 6020 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the A2200 and 6020 is 95 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f4a9/6f4a91c6d1f332c5ee59871621578de08348b245" alt="Canon A2200 vs Olympus 6020 top view buttons comparison Canon A2200 vs Olympus 6020 top view buttons comparison"
Canon A2200 vs Olympus 6020 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizes just by reading specs. The picture here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the A2200 and 6020.
All in all, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Canon A2200 to offer you more detail as a result of its extra 1MP. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures more aggressively. The fresher A2200 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6f51/c6f5189703b0e4744c3018e1f8ec40e0d2d5346d" alt="Canon A2200 vs Olympus 6020 sensor size comparison Canon A2200 vs Olympus 6020 sensor size comparison"
Canon A2200 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0dd7d/0dd7d4b25493b9a1fc2c4bcf56e9b929e2a7f6f7" alt="Canon A2200 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon A2200 vs Olympus 6020 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Canon A2200 vs Olympus 6020 Specifications
Canon PowerShot A2200 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon PowerShot A2200 | Olympus Stylus Tough 6020 |
Alternative name | - | mju Tough 6020 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2010-02-02 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 64 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 1/4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.00 m | 4.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 135 gr (0.30 lb) | 122 gr (0.27 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 93 x 57 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 95 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-8L | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HCMMCplus | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $139 | $279 |