Canon A2200 vs Olympus XZ-10
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
91 Imaging
35 Features
57 Overall
43
Canon A2200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 135g - 93 x 57 x 24mm
- Introduced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Launched January 2013
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Canon A2200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Canon A2200 vs Olympus XZ-10, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the A2200 (14MP) and the XZ-10 (12MP) is fairly comparable and they use the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe A2200 was revealed 3 years earlier than the XZ-10 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the A2200 scores vs the XZ-10 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon A2200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot A2200 and Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The full galleries are viewable at Canon A2200 Gallery and Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A2200 over the Olympus XZ-10
| A2200 | XZ-10 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Canon A2200
| XZ-10 | A2200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | January 2011 | Fresher by 25 months |
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Canon A2200 and Olympus XZ-10
| A2200 | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Canon A2200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Canon A2200 has got outer dimensions of 93mm x 57mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-10 has dimensions of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check out the Canon A2200 vs Olympus XZ-10 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the A2200 compared to the XZ-10.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the A2200 and XZ-10 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Canon A2200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing simply by seeing specifications. The photograph underneath may offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the A2200 and XZ-10.
Plainly, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should anticipate the Canon A2200 to show more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a little more aggressively. The older A2200 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon A2200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon A2200 vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A2200 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A2200 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2011-01-05 | 2013-01-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/1.8-2.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 135 grams (0.30 pounds) | 221 grams (0.49 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 57 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 280 photos | 240 photos |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-8L | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HCMMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $139 | $428 |