Canon A2200 vs Olympus TG-310
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
![Canon PowerShot A2200 front Canon PowerShot A2200 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Canon-PowerShot-A2200/Canon-A2200-front.jpg)
![Olympus TG-310 front Olympus TG-310 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-TG-310/Olympus-TG-310-front.jpg)
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Canon A2200 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 135g - 93 x 57 x 24mm
- Revealed January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Canon A2200 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Canon A2200 and Olympus TG-310, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the A2200 (14MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is very close and they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
The A2200 was released about the same time to the TG-310 which means that they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a thorough comparison, below is a simple overview of how the A2200 grades versus the TG-310 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Canon A2200 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot A2200 & Olympus TG-310. The complete galleries are provided at Canon A2200 Gallery & Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A2200 over the Olympus TG-310
A2200 | TG-310 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Canon A2200
TG-310 | A2200 |
---|
Common features in the Canon A2200 and Olympus TG-310
A2200 | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2011 | ![]() | January 2011 | Same age |
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.7" | Identical display measurements |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Identical display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch display |
Canon A2200 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Canon A2200 comes with exterior dimensions of 93mm x 57mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Olympus TG-310 has specifications of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Canon A2200 and Olympus TG-310 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the A2200 versus the TG-310.
![Canon A2200 vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison Canon A2200 vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A2200-vs-Olympus-TG-310-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the A2200 and TG-310 is 95 and 94 respectively.
![Canon A2200 vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison Canon A2200 vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A2200-vs-Olympus-TG-310-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Canon A2200 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by looking through technical specs. The pic below will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the A2200 and TG-310.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of photographs though you might want to factor the launch date of the cameras into account.
![Canon A2200 vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison Canon A2200 vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A2200-vs-Olympus-TG-310-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Canon A2200 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
![Canon A2200 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon A2200 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A2200-vs-Olympus-TG-310-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Canon A2200 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
Canon PowerShot A2200 | Olympus TG-310 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
Model type | Canon PowerShot A2200 | Olympus TG-310 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2011-01-06 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 9 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1600 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.00 m | 4.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 135g (0.30 pounds) | 155g (0.34 pounds) |
Dimensions | 93 x 57 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 280 photos | 150 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NB-8L | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HCMMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $139 | $0 |