Clicky

Canon A2200 vs Olympus TG-320

Portability
95
Imaging
37
Features
28
Overall
33
Canon PowerShot A2200 front
 
Olympus TG-320 front
Portability
94
Imaging
38
Features
33
Overall
36

Canon A2200 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs

Canon A2200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 135g - 93 x 57 x 24mm
  • Launched January 2011
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
  • 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Canon A2200 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview

Here, we are matching up the Canon A2200 vs Olympus TG-320, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by companies Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the A2200 (14MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is very similar and both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The A2200 was introduced 12 months earlier than the TG-320 so they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before going right into a full comparison, here is a concise summation of how the A2200 matches up vs the TG-320 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon A2200 over the Olympus TG-320

 A2200 TG-320 

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Canon A2200

 TG-320 A2200 
RevealedJanuary 2012January 2011Newer by 12 months

Common features in the Canon A2200 and Olympus TG-320

 A2200 TG-320 
Focus manually No manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size2.7"2.7"Same display dimensions
Display resolution230k230kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Canon A2200 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and proportions. The Canon A2200 has outside dimensions of 93mm x 57mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Olympus TG-320 has measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).

Analyze the Canon A2200 vs Olympus TG-320 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the A2200 versus the TG-320.

Canon A2200 vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the A2200 and TG-320 is 95 and 94 respectively.

Canon A2200 vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison

Canon A2200 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison

Generally, its difficult to envision the gap between sensor dimensions purely by reading specs. The image underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the A2200 and TG-320.

As you can plainly see, both cameras come with the identical sensor size and the exact same megapixels so you should expect similar quality of pictures but you really should factor the release date of the products into consideration. The more aged A2200 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Canon A2200 vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison

Canon A2200 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon A2200 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon A2200 Portrait photography information
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography information
33
decent megapixels (14MP)
supports face detect autofocus
manual focus not available
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
34
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
includes face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Canon A2200 Street photography factors
Olympus TG-320 Street photography factors
55
lighter than average in class (135 grams)
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
66
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
lighter than competition (155 grams)
fixed screen
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Canon A2200 Sports photography details
Olympus TG-320 Sports photography details
37
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
good battery life (280 shots)
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
41
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
includes tracking focus
environment proofing
max fps low (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery (150 CIPA)
does not have phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Canon A2200 Travel photography highlights
Olympus TG-320 Travel photography highlights
70
good battery life (280 shots)
lighter than average in class (135g)
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse mode
does not have selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
67
lighter than competition (155 grams)
environment proofing
megapixel count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse recording
terrible battery (150 shots)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Canon A2200 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-320 as a Landscape photography camera
36
really wide (28mm)
decent megapixels (14MP)
good battery life (280 shots)
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
lack of Time Lapse mode
39
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
environment proofing
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not available
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
terrible battery (150 per charge)
missing Timelapse recording
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Canon A2200 Vlogging highlights
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging highlights
30
really wide (28mm)
supports face detect autofocus
lighter than average in class (135g)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not have selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic port
32
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect autofocus
lighter than competition (155 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
missing microphone port
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Canon A2200 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A2200 and Olympus TG-320
 Canon PowerShot A2200Olympus TG-320
General Information
Manufacturer Canon Olympus
Model Canon PowerShot A2200 Olympus TG-320
Class Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Launched 2011-01-05 2012-01-10
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology TruePic III+
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 -
Maximum resolution 4320 x 3240 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 1600 1600
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 9 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-5.9 f/3.5-5.1
Macro focus distance 3cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech TFT LCD TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/1600 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 1.0fps 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.00 m 5.80 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 135g (0.30 lb) 155g (0.34 lb)
Physical dimensions 93 x 57 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 280 photographs 150 photographs
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NB-8L LI-42B
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HCMMCplus SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $139 $0