Canon A2200 vs Ricoh WG-M1
95 Imaging
36 Features
28 Overall
32
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
Canon A2200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 135g - 93 x 57 x 24mm
- Announced January 2011
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Revealed September 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Canon A2200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Canon A2200 vs Ricoh WG-M1, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Canon and Ricoh. The resolution of the A2200 (14MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is very comparable and they use the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe A2200 was released 4 years earlier than the WG-M1 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise view of how the A2200 scores vs the WG-M1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon A2200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot A2200 & Ricoh WG-M1. The complete galleries are available at Canon A2200 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A2200 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| A2200 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 2.7" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.2") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Canon A2200
| WG-M1 | A2200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | September 2014 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 44 months |
Common features in the Canon A2200 and Ricoh WG-M1
| A2200 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither has Touch display |
Canon A2200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Canon A2200 has exterior dimensions of 93mm x 57mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has specifications of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Compare the Canon A2200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the A2200 compared to the WG-M1.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A2200 and WG-M1 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Canon A2200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to envision the gap in sensor dimensions purely by going through technical specs. The image here will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the A2200 and WG-M1.
As you have seen, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the identical MP therefore you can expect comparable quality of photographs though you may want to take the launch date of the cameras into account. The more aged A2200 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Canon A2200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Canon A2200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A2200 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A2200 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2011-01-05 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | DIGIC 4 with iSAPS technology | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | (1×) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 115k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | TFT LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 135g (0.30 lb) | 190g (0.42 lb) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 57 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 280 photos | 350 photos |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-8L | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HCMMCplus | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $139 | $2,000 |