Canon A2300 vs Olympus 9000
96 Imaging
39 Features
25 Overall
33
92 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Canon A2300 vs Olympus 9000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 125g - 95 x 54 x 20mm
- Released February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-280mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 225g - 96 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced May 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 9000
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon A2300 vs Olympus 9000 Overview
Here is a comprehensive comparison of the Canon A2300 versus Olympus 9000, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by brands Canon and Olympus. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the A2300 (16MP) and 9000 (12MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe A2300 was introduced 2 years later than the 9000 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the A2300 matches up against the 9000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon A2300 vs Olympus 9000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot A2300 and Olympus Stylus 9000. The whole galleries are available at Canon A2300 Gallery and Olympus 9000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A2300 over the Olympus 9000
| A2300 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2012 | May 2009 | Fresher by 34 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus 9000 over the Canon A2300
| 9000 | A2300 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon A2300 and Olympus 9000
| A2300 | 9000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 2.7" | 2.7" | Same display dimensions | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Canon A2300 vs Olympus 9000 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and measurements. The Canon A2300 features outside measurements of 95mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Olympus 9000 has proportions of 96mm x 60mm x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 225 grams (0.50 lbs).
Analyze the Canon A2300 versus Olympus 9000 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Following is a front view sizing comparison of the A2300 compared to the 9000.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the A2300 and 9000 is 96 and 92 respectively.
Canon A2300 vs Olympus 9000 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to picture the difference in sensor sizing just by researching specifications. The graphic here might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the A2300 and 9000.
To sum up, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but different resolution. You should anticipate the Canon A2300 to result in extra detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will let you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more recent A2300 provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Canon A2300 vs Olympus 9000 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Canon A2300 vs Olympus 9000 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A2300 | Olympus Stylus 9000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot A2300 | Olympus Stylus 9000 |
| Also called as | - | mju 9000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2012-02-07 | 2009-05-14 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 50 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-280mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/3.2-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125 grams (0.28 pounds) | 225 grams (0.50 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 54 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 96 x 60 x 31mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 pictures | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-11L | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $139 | $300 |