Canon A2300 vs Olympus 8010
96 Imaging
38 Features
25 Overall
32
92 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
Canon A2300 vs Olympus 8010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 125g - 95 x 54 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Announced February 2010
- Alternative Name is mju Tough 8010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon A2300 vs Olympus 8010 Overview
Below is a detailed review of the Canon A2300 and Olympus 8010, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Canon and Olympus. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the A2300 (16MP) and 8010 (13MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe A2300 was manufactured 2 years later than the 8010 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the A2300 grades versus the 8010 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon A2300 vs Olympus 8010 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot A2300 & Olympus Stylus Tough 8010. The entire galleries are viewable at Canon A2300 Gallery & Olympus 8010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A2300 over the Olympus 8010
| A2300 | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2012 | February 2010 | More recent by 25 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Canon A2300
| 8010 | A2300 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon A2300 and Olympus 8010
| A2300 | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 2.7" | 2.7" | Identical screen sizing | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Canon A2300 vs Olympus 8010 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Canon A2300 has got physical measurements of 95mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Olympus 8010 has sizing of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Canon A2300 and Olympus 8010 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the A2300 against the 8010.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A2300 and 8010 is 96 and 92 respectively.
Canon A2300 vs Olympus 8010 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to picture the difference in sensor measurements just by viewing a spec sheet. The visual underneath should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the A2300 and 8010.
Clearly, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can expect the Canon A2300 to result in extra detail due to its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The newer A2300 provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Canon A2300 vs Olympus 8010 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon A2300 vs Olympus 8010 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A2300 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot A2300 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 |
| Also referred to as | - | mju Tough 8010 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2012-02-07 | 2010-02-02 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 1/4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 pounds) | 245g (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 54 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-11L | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $139 | $600 |