Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
96 Imaging
39 Features
25 Overall
33
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 125g - 95 x 54 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Canon A2300 versus Olympus TG-630 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Olympus. There exists a considerable gap among the sensor resolutions of the A2300 (16MP) and TG-630 iHS (12MP) but they possess the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe A2300 was unveiled 11 months prior to the TG-630 iHS so they are of a similar age. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the A2300 grades vs the TG-630 iHS for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot A2300 & Olympus TG-630 iHS. The full galleries are available at Canon A2300 Gallery & Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A2300 over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
| A2300 | TG-630 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Canon A2300
| TG-630 iHS | A2300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | February 2012 | Newer by 11 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A2300 and Olympus TG-630 iHS
| A2300 | TG-630 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Canon A2300 enjoys outer dimensions of 95mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Olympus TG-630 iHS has measurements of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Canon A2300 versus Olympus TG-630 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have at that moment. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the A2300 against the TG-630 iHS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A2300 and TG-630 iHS is 96 and 94 respectively.
Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to picture the difference in sensor dimensions merely by checking out technical specs. The image underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the A2300 and TG-630 iHS.
As you can tell, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Canon A2300 to provide greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged A2300 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon A2300 vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A2300 | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot A2300 | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2012-02-07 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lb) | 167 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 54 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 images | 220 images |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-11L | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $139 | $200 |