Clicky

Canon A2300 vs Olympus VR-340

Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
25
Overall
33
Canon PowerShot A2300 front
 
Olympus VR-340 front
Portability
96
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37

Canon A2300 vs Olympus VR-340 Key Specs

Canon A2300
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
  • 125g - 95 x 54 x 20mm
  • Launched February 2012
Olympus VR-340
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-240mm (F3.0-5.7) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Canon A2300 vs Olympus VR-340 Overview

Lets look more closely at the Canon A2300 and Olympus VR-340, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Canon and Olympus. The resolution of the A2300 (16MP) and the VR-340 (16MP) is fairly close and they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The A2300 was unveiled about the same time to the VR-340 so they are of a similar generation. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).

Before getting through a in depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the A2300 grades versus the VR-340 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Canon A2300 over the Olympus VR-340

 A2300 VR-340 

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-340 over the Canon A2300

 VR-340 A2300 
Display dimension3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Canon A2300 and Olympus VR-340

 A2300 VR-340 
RevealedFebruary 2012January 2012Same generation
Manual focus Lack of manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither comes with Touch friendly display

Canon A2300 vs Olympus VR-340 Physical Comparison

When you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor its weight and proportions. The Canon A2300 comes with exterior measurements of 95mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Olympus VR-340 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).

Contrast the Canon A2300 and Olympus VR-340 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at the time. The following is the front view size comparison of the A2300 and the VR-340.

Canon A2300 vs Olympus VR-340 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the A2300 and VR-340 is 96 and 96 respectively.

Canon A2300 vs Olympus VR-340 top view buttons comparison

Canon A2300 vs Olympus VR-340 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very tough to see the contrast in sensor sizes just by viewing specs. The pic underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the A2300 and VR-340.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the identical MP so you should expect comparable quality of photos although you need to consider the release date of the cameras into account.

Canon A2300 vs Olympus VR-340 sensor size comparison

Canon A2300 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and ViewFinder

Canon A2300 vs Olympus VR-340 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Canon A2300 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus VR-340 as a Portrait photography camera
34
decent MP (16MP)
has face detection focus
no manual focus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
34
megapixel count decent (16MP)
comes with face detection focus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Canon A2300 as a Street photography camera
Olympus VR-340 as a Street photography camera
56
lighter than average (125g)
no moving screen
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
63
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (125g)
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Canon A2300
Sports photography with Olympus VR-340
32
decent MP (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (210 CIPA)
does not have phase detect auto focus
44
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with tracking autofocus
lack of shutter priority mode
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Canon A2300 Travel photography advice
Olympus VR-340 Travel photography advice
66
lighter than average (125g)
decent MP (16MP)
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
terrible battery life (210 per charge)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
69
lighter than competition (125g)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
pretty wide (24mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Canon A2300 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus VR-340 Landscape photography highlights
33
really wide (28mm)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
tiny screen (2.7")
manual exposure not possible
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
terrible battery life (210 per charge)
lack of Time Lapse function
43
pretty wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
manual exposure not possible
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Canon A2300 Vlogging information
Olympus VR-340 Vlogging information
30
really wide (28mm)
has face detection focus
lighter than average (125 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not contain selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external mic port
33
pretty wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focus
lighter than competition (125 grams)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have external mic port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Canon A2300 vs Olympus VR-340 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Canon A2300 and Olympus VR-340
 Canon PowerShot A2300Olympus VR-340
General Information
Manufacturer Canon Olympus
Model type Canon PowerShot A2300 Olympus VR-340
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2012-02-07 2012-01-10
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 9 -
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 24-240mm (10.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.8-6.9 f/3.0-5.7
Macro focusing distance 3cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 15 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 1.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.00 m 4.80 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 125 grams (0.28 pounds) 125 grams (0.28 pounds)
Dimensions 95 x 54 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 210 pictures -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID NB-11L LI-50B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Launch cost $139 $130