Canon A2300 vs Samsung SL202
96 Imaging
38 Features
25 Overall
32
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Canon A2300 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 125g - 95 x 54 x 20mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Alternate Name is PL50
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Canon A2300 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Canon A2300 versus Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by brands Canon and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap between the sensor resolutions of the A2300 (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe A2300 was brought out 3 years after the SL202 which is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick view of how the A2300 scores against the SL202 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon A2300 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot A2300 & Samsung SL202. The entire galleries are available at Canon A2300 Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A2300 over the Samsung SL202
| A2300 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2012 | February 2009 | Newer by 37 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Canon A2300
| SL202 | A2300 |
|---|
Common features in the Canon A2300 and Samsung SL202
| A2300 | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 2.7" | 2.7" | Equivalent display dimensions | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Identical display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | No Touch display |
Canon A2300 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and proportions. The Canon A2300 has exterior dimensions of 95mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Canon A2300 versus Samsung SL202 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the A2300 and the SL202.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A2300 and SL202 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Canon A2300 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions just by checking technical specs. The image below may give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the A2300 and SL202.
As you can tell, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can anticipate the Canon A2300 to give greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The newer A2300 provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Canon A2300 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Canon A2300 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A2300 | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Canon | Samsung |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A2300 | Samsung SL202 |
| Also called as | - | PL50 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-02-07 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 grams (0.28 lbs) | 168 grams (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 54 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NB-11L | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $139 | $140 |