Canon A2300 vs Samsung TL350
96 Imaging
39 Features
25 Overall
33
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Canon A2300 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 125g - 95 x 54 x 20mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Additionally referred to as WB2000
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon A2300 vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Following is a thorough assessment of the Canon A2300 vs Samsung TL350, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Canon and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the A2300 (16MP) and TL350 (10MP) but they feature the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe A2300 was launched 24 months after the TL350 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise summation of how the A2300 scores versus the TL350 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon A2300 vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot A2300 & Samsung TL350. The complete galleries are provided at Canon A2300 Gallery & Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A2300 over the Samsung TL350
| A2300 | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2012 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 24 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Canon A2300
| TL350 | A2300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A2300 and Samsung TL350
| A2300 | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Canon A2300 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Canon A2300 offers external dimensions of 95mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL350 has dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Canon A2300 vs Samsung TL350 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view scale comparison of the A2300 versus the TL350.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the A2300 and TL350 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Canon A2300 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizes just by looking through specs. The picture below might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the A2300 and TL350.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Canon A2300 to render greater detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The newer A2300 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon A2300 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Canon A2300 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A2300 | Samsung TL350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Samsung |
| Model | Canon PowerShot A2300 | Samsung TL350 |
| Otherwise known as | - | WB2000 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2012-02-07 | 2010-02-20 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/2.4-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 3cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | 5.20 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 pounds) | 195 gr (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 54 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 210 photos | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NB-11L | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $139 | $400 |