Canon A2400 IS vs Fujifilm XP200
96 Imaging
38 Features
28 Overall
34
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Canon A2400 IS vs Fujifilm XP200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 126g - 94 x 54 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Released March 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Canon A2400 IS vs Fujifilm XP200 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Canon A2400 IS vs Fujifilm XP200, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Canon and FujiFilm. The sensor resolution of the A2400 IS (16MP) and the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) is relatively well matched and both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe A2400 IS was released 13 months prior to the Fujifilm XP200 which makes them a generation apart from one another. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the A2400 IS matches up vs the Fujifilm XP200 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon A2400 IS vs Fujifilm XP200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot A2400 IS and Fujifilm FinePix XP200. The complete galleries are provided at Canon A2400 IS Gallery and Fujifilm XP200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A2400 IS over the Fujifilm XP200
| A2400 IS | Fujifilm XP200 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Canon A2400 IS
| Fujifilm XP200 | A2400 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2013 |  | February 2012 | More recent by 13 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A2400 IS and Fujifilm XP200
| A2400 IS | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither contains Touch screen |
Canon A2400 IS vs Fujifilm XP200 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon A2400 IS has got exterior dimensions of 94mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") with a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm XP200 has dimensions of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") along with a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon A2400 IS vs Fujifilm XP200 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the A2400 IS and the Fujifilm XP200.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A2400 IS and Fujifilm XP200 is 96 and 90 respectively.
Canon A2400 IS vs Fujifilm XP200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements purely by checking specifications. The photograph here will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the A2400 IS and Fujifilm XP200.
To sum up, the 2 cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same resolution therefore you should expect similar quality of images though you really should consider the production date of the products into consideration. The older A2400 IS is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Canon A2400 IS vs Fujifilm XP200 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon A2400 IS vs Fujifilm XP200 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A2400 IS | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Canon | FujiFilm |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A2400 IS | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2012-02-07 | 2013-03-22 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/3.9-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 126 gr (0.28 lbs) | 232 gr (0.51 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 94 x 54 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 190 images | 300 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-11L | NP-50A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $149 | $250 |