Canon A2400 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
96 Imaging
38 Features
28 Overall
34
90 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Canon A2400 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 126g - 94 x 54 x 20mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- Successor is Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon A2400 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Below is a extensive assessment of the Canon A2400 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Canon and Ricoh. The image resolution of the A2400 IS (16MP) and the WG-4 GPS (16MP) is relatively well matched and they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe A2400 IS was launched 24 months earlier than the WG-4 GPS which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a full comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the A2400 IS scores vs the WG-4 GPS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon A2400 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot A2400 IS & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The complete galleries are viewable at Canon A2400 IS Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A2400 IS over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| A2400 IS | WG-4 GPS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Canon A2400 IS
| WG-4 GPS | A2400 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | February 2012 | More recent by 24 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A2400 IS and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| A2400 IS | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Canon A2400 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Canon A2400 IS comes with outside dimensions of 94mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") and a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon A2400 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the A2400 IS against the WG-4 GPS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A2400 IS and WG-4 GPS is 96 and 90 respectively.
Canon A2400 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to picture the difference between sensor measurements just by looking at specifications. The graphic here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the A2400 IS and WG-4 GPS.
Plainly, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the identical megapixels so you can expect similar quality of pictures though you should really factor the age of the products into consideration. The older A2400 IS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Canon A2400 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon A2400 IS vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A2400 IS | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Canon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A2400 IS | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2012-02-07 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 126 grams (0.28 lb) | 235 grams (0.52 lb) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 54 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 190 photos | 240 photos |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-11L | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $149 | $210 |