Canon A2400 IS vs Samsung SL102
96 Imaging
39 Features
28 Overall
34
![Canon PowerShot A2400 IS front Canon PowerShot A2400 IS front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Canon-PowerShot-A2400-IS/Canon-A2400-IS-front.jpg)
![Samsung SL102 front Samsung SL102 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-SL102/Samsung-SL102-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Canon A2400 IS vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 126g - 94 x 54 x 20mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Also referred to as ES55
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Canon A2400 IS vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Following is a extensive assessment of the Canon A2400 IS versus Samsung SL102, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Canon and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference between the resolutions of the A2400 IS (16MP) and SL102 (10MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The A2400 IS was introduced 3 years after the SL102 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the A2400 IS matches up versus the SL102 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Canon A2400 IS vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot A2400 IS & Samsung SL102. The whole galleries are available at Canon A2400 IS Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A2400 IS over the Samsung SL102
A2400 IS | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2012 | ![]() | January 2009 | More modern by 38 months |
Display size | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the Canon A2400 IS
SL102 | A2400 IS |
---|
Common features in the Canon A2400 IS and Samsung SL102
A2400 IS | SL102 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Canon A2400 IS vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and volume. The Canon A2400 IS enjoys outside dimensions of 94mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 126 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Samsung SL102 has sizing of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Contrast the Canon A2400 IS versus Samsung SL102 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the A2400 IS versus the SL102.
![Canon A2400 IS vs Samsung SL102 size comparison Canon A2400 IS vs Samsung SL102 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A2400-IS-vs-Samsung-SL102-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the A2400 IS and SL102 is 96 and 96 respectively.
![Canon A2400 IS vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison Canon A2400 IS vs Samsung SL102 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A2400-IS-vs-Samsung-SL102-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Canon A2400 IS vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The image below will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the A2400 IS and SL102.
As you can see, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Canon A2400 IS to offer extra detail using its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images way more aggressively. The newer A2400 IS should have an edge in sensor innovation.
![Canon A2400 IS vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison Canon A2400 IS vs Samsung SL102 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A2400-IS-vs-Samsung-SL102-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Canon A2400 IS vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
![Canon A2400 IS vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon A2400 IS vs Samsung SL102 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A2400-IS-vs-Samsung-SL102-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Canon A2400 IS vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
Canon PowerShot A2400 IS | Samsung SL102 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Samsung |
Model | Canon PowerShot A2400 IS | Samsung SL102 |
Also referred to as | - | ES55 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-02-07 | 2009-01-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | 10cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 2.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 126 grams (0.28 lb) | 116 grams (0.26 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 94 x 54 x 20mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.8") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 190 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-11L | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $149 | $130 |