Canon A2500 vs Olympus FE-5010
96 Imaging
40 Features
29 Overall
35
![Canon PowerShot A2500 front Canon PowerShot A2500 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Canon-PowerShot-A2500/Canon-A2500-front.jpg)
![Olympus FE-5010 front Olympus FE-5010 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-FE-5010/Olympus-FE-5010-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
34 Features
20 Overall
28
Canon A2500 vs Olympus FE-5010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 135g - 98 x 56 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-180mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 130g - 96 x 57 x 21mm
- Released January 2009
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Canon A2500 vs Olympus FE-5010 Overview
Below is a detailed review of the Canon A2500 versus Olympus FE-5010, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by companies Canon and Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the A2500 (16MP) and FE-5010 (12MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
The A2500 was introduced 4 years later than the FE-5010 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short summation of how the A2500 scores against the FE-5010 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Canon A2500 vs Olympus FE-5010 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot A2500 and Olympus FE-5010. The whole galleries are provided at Canon A2500 Gallery and Olympus FE-5010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A2500 over the Olympus FE-5010
A2500 | FE-5010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 50 months |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5010 over the Canon A2500
FE-5010 | A2500 |
---|
Common features in the Canon A2500 and Olympus FE-5010
A2500 | FE-5010 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Canon A2500 vs Olympus FE-5010 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Canon A2500 comes with outside measurements of 98mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Olympus FE-5010 has dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs).
Check out the Canon A2500 versus Olympus FE-5010 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the A2500 versus the FE-5010.
![Canon A2500 vs Olympus FE-5010 size comparison Canon A2500 vs Olympus FE-5010 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A2500-vs-Olympus-FE-5010-size-comparison.jpg)
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the A2500 and FE-5010 is 96 and 96 respectively.
![Canon A2500 vs Olympus FE-5010 top view buttons comparison Canon A2500 vs Olympus FE-5010 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A2500-vs-Olympus-FE-5010-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Canon A2500 vs Olympus FE-5010 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to picture the contrast between sensor measurements merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual here should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the A2500 and FE-5010.
As you can see, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You should count on the Canon A2500 to deliver more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The fresher A2500 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
![Canon A2500 vs Olympus FE-5010 sensor size comparison Canon A2500 vs Olympus FE-5010 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A2500-vs-Olympus-FE-5010-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Canon A2500 vs Olympus FE-5010 Screen and ViewFinder
![Canon A2500 vs Olympus FE-5010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon A2500 vs Olympus FE-5010 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Canon-PowerShot-A2500-vs-Olympus-FE-5010-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Canon A2500 vs Olympus FE-5010 Specifications
Canon PowerShot A2500 | Olympus FE-5010 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon PowerShot A2500 | Olympus FE-5010 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2009-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 36-180mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 1.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 4.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 135 gr (0.30 pounds) | 130 gr (0.29 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 56 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 96 x 57 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NB-11L | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD-Picture Card (1GB, 2GB), microSD (MASD-1 is required) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $109 | $130 |