Canon A2500 vs Olympus TG-310
96 Imaging
39 Features
29 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cee37/cee37d6cf43ca683c84e7cdf8b5e6d71ee635e22" alt="Canon PowerShot A2500 front Canon PowerShot A2500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de436/de436c1d22864ee65c1aad5da965732699f4570f" alt="Olympus TG-310 front Olympus TG-310 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Canon A2500 vs Olympus TG-310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 135g - 98 x 56 x 20mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Canon A2500 vs Olympus TG-310 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Canon A2500 versus Olympus TG-310, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the A2500 (16MP) and the TG-310 (14MP) is pretty well matched and they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The A2500 was manufactured 2 years after the TG-310 which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the A2500 grades versus the TG-310 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Canon A2500 vs Olympus TG-310 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot A2500 & Olympus TG-310. The entire galleries are available at Canon A2500 Gallery & Olympus TG-310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A2500 over the Olympus TG-310
A2500 | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2011 | Newer by 26 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-310 over the Canon A2500
TG-310 | A2500 |
---|
Common features in the Canon A2500 and Olympus TG-310
A2500 | TG-310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | No manual focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither contains Touch screen |
Canon A2500 vs Olympus TG-310 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and volume. The Canon A2500 has got exterior dimensions of 98mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Olympus TG-310 has sizing of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") and a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Canon A2500 versus Olympus TG-310 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the A2500 versus the TG-310.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe05a/fe05a2094dcaee50ee8edf25e8f32babf64f4967" alt="Canon A2500 vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison Canon A2500 vs Olympus TG-310 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the A2500 and TG-310 is 96 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/49f96/49f962f7e56d002129fe9baaa4af734a8193a569" alt="Canon A2500 vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison Canon A2500 vs Olympus TG-310 top view buttons comparison"
Canon A2500 vs Olympus TG-310 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions only by checking technical specs. The image below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the A2500 and TG-310.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can expect the Canon A2500 to resolve greater detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more recent A2500 provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab84a/ab84a82d832373b23813b6babc03b39bda574bf4" alt="Canon A2500 vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison Canon A2500 vs Olympus TG-310 sensor size comparison"
Canon A2500 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31e30/31e3068b68526dabab00b3e4b5b2cb3b35a41059" alt="Canon A2500 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon A2500 vs Olympus TG-310 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Canon A2500 vs Olympus TG-310 Specifications
Canon PowerShot A2500 | Olympus TG-310 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon PowerShot A2500 | Olympus TG-310 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Released | 2013-01-29 | 2011-01-06 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 4.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 135 gr (0.30 pounds) | 155 gr (0.34 pounds) |
Dimensions | 98 x 56 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 shots | 150 shots |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-11L | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $109 | $0 |