Canon A2500 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
96 Imaging
40 Features
29 Overall
35
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Canon A2500 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 135g - 98 x 56 x 20mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Canon A2500 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Canon A2500 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the A2500 (16MP) and TG-1 iHS (12MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe A2500 was launched 9 months later than the TG-1 iHS so they are both of a similar age. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple overview of how the A2500 matches up against the TG-1 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Canon A2500 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot A2500 & Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Canon A2500 Gallery & Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A2500 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| A2500 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | May 2012 | Fresher by 9 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Canon A2500
| TG-1 iHS | A2500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+380k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A2500 and Olympus TG-1 iHS
| A2500 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Canon A2500 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and size. The Canon A2500 offers exterior dimensions of 98mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) while the Olympus TG-1 iHS has specifications of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Look at the Canon A2500 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the A2500 and the TG-1 iHS.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A2500 and TG-1 iHS is 96 and 91 respectively.
Canon A2500 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to visualize the gap in sensor sizing just by seeing specs. The photograph here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the A2500 and TG-1 iHS.
All in all, the 2 cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You can anticipate the Canon A2500 to provide greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more modern A2500 provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Canon A2500 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Canon A2500 vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A2500 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A2500 | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2013-01-29 | 2012-05-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 610k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 135 gr (0.30 pounds) | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 56 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 images | 350 images |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-11L | LI90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $109 | $399 |
