Canon A2500 vs Olympus XZ-1
96 Imaging
39 Features
29 Overall
35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cee37/cee37d6cf43ca683c84e7cdf8b5e6d71ee635e22" alt="Canon PowerShot A2500 front Canon PowerShot A2500 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d8da/9d8da4d616e0872484d1d6071e9a9d7184378d49" alt="Olympus XZ-1 front Olympus XZ-1 front"
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Canon A2500 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 135g - 98 x 56 x 20mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Announced January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Canon A2500 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Canon A2500 versus Olympus XZ-1, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Canon and Olympus. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the A2500 (16MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the A2500 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") provide totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The A2500 was manufactured 2 years later than the XZ-1 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the A2500 grades against the XZ-1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Canon A2500 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot A2500 and Olympus XZ-1. The entire galleries are provided at Canon A2500 Gallery and Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A2500 over the Olympus XZ-1
A2500 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | ![]() | January 2011 | Fresher by 25 months |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Canon A2500
XZ-1 | A2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A2500 and Olympus XZ-1
A2500 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | No Touch friendly display |
Canon A2500 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Canon A2500 features outside dimensions of 98mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-1 has dimensions of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") with a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Check the Canon A2500 versus Olympus XZ-1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the A2500 compared to the XZ-1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ecca9/ecca9ce5a2c80dbddfde015a6a3fadcb1a0ac82d" alt="Canon A2500 vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison Canon A2500 vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A2500 and XZ-1 is 96 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6dcbe/6dcbe4a412d3249e54232c55f602b538e2205fea" alt="Canon A2500 vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison Canon A2500 vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison"
Canon A2500 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizing just by reading through a spec sheet. The graphic here will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the A2500 and XZ-1.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The A2500 featuring a tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Canon A2500 will give more detail due to its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The newer A2500 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4162b/4162b38cf0c64d39fb156f21dbe68367e43aaafc" alt="Canon A2500 vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison Canon A2500 vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison"
Canon A2500 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5dbd6/5dbd648e39396c6326495b39330fb94047e80bb1" alt="Canon A2500 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Canon A2500 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Canon A2500 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
Canon PowerShot A2500 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Canon | Olympus |
Model | Canon PowerShot A2500 | Olympus XZ-1 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2013-01-29 | 2011-01-26 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3664 x 2752 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 614k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 15 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 135 grams (0.30 pounds) | 275 grams (0.61 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 98 x 56 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 34 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 117 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photographs | 320 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NB-11L | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $109 | $567 |