Canon A2500 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS
96 Imaging
39 Features
29 Overall
35
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Canon A2500 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 135g - 98 x 56 x 20mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon A2500 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Overview
Lets look closer at the Canon A2500 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by companies Canon and Pentax. The resolution of the A2500 (16MP) and the WG-1 GPS (14MP) is relatively similar and both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe A2500 was announced 18 months later than the WG-1 GPS which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the A2500 scores against the WG-1 GPS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Canon A2500 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Canon PowerShot A2500 & Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS. The whole galleries are available at Canon A2500 Gallery & Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A2500 over the Pentax WG-1 GPS
| A2500 | WG-1 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | August 2011 | Fresher by 18 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 GPS over the Canon A2500
| WG-1 GPS | A2500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focus |
Common features in the Canon A2500 and Pentax WG-1 GPS
| A2500 | WG-1 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Canon A2500 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera frequently, you have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Canon A2500 provides outer measurements of 98mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Pentax WG-1 GPS has proportions of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Canon A2500 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the A2500 against the WG-1 GPS.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the A2500 and WG-1 GPS is 96 and 93 respectively.
Canon A2500 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to imagine the gap between sensor sizing simply by reviewing specifications. The visual here may give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the A2500 and WG-1 GPS.
To sum up, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Canon A2500 to deliver extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more recent A2500 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Canon A2500 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Canon A2500 vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A2500 | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Pentax |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A2500 | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Announced | 2013-01-29 | 2011-08-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.90 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (25 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 135 grams (0.30 lb) | 167 grams (0.37 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 98 x 56 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 pictures | 260 pictures |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-11L | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $109 | $350 |