Canon A2500 vs Samsung WB30F

Here, we are contrasting the Canon A2500 versus Samsung WB30F, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Canon and Samsung. The resolution of the A2500 (16MP) and the WB30F (16MP) is very similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The A2500 was unveiled at a similar time to the WB30F so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the A2500 grades vs the WB30F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

This is a sample of the gallery pics for Canon PowerShot A2500 & Samsung WB30F. The full galleries are available at Canon A2500 Gallery & Samsung WB30F Gallery.

When you are intending to carry your camera, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Canon A2500 has external dimensions of 98mm x 56mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB30F has dimensions of 98mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).

Contrast the Canon A2500 versus Samsung WB30F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the A2500 compared to the WB30F.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the A2500 and WB30F is 96 and 96 respectively.

In many cases, it's hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizing just by going over specs. The visual below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the A2500 and WB30F.

All in all, both cameras come with the identical sensor size and the exact same megapixels so you can expect similar quality of photographs although you should factor the age of the products into consideration.