Canon A3100 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
94 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Canon A3100 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-140mm (F2.7-5.6) lens
- 165g - 97 x 58 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced February 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon A3100 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Canon A3100 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Canon and Olympus. The image resolution of the A3100 IS (12MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe A3100 IS was unveiled 3 years before the TG-820 iHS and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the A3100 IS grades versus the TG-820 iHS when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Canon A3100 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Canon PowerShot A3100 IS & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The full galleries are provided at Canon A3100 IS Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A3100 IS over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| A3100 IS | TG-820 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Canon A3100 IS
| TG-820 iHS | A3100 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2012 | January 2010 | More recent by 25 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 1030k | 230k | Clearer screen (+800k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A3100 IS and Olympus TG-820 iHS
| A3100 IS | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Canon A3100 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to lug around your camera often, you should factor its weight and size. The Canon A3100 IS features external measurements of 97mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs) and the Olympus TG-820 iHS has specifications of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Compare the Canon A3100 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at the time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the A3100 IS vs the TG-820 iHS.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the A3100 IS and TG-820 iHS is 94 and 92 respectively.
Canon A3100 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, its tough to imagine the gap between sensor measurements simply by reading through technical specs. The photograph below will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the A3100 IS and TG-820 iHS.
As you have seen, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the exact same MP therefore you can expect similar quality of photographs although you have to factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The older A3100 IS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Canon A3100 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Canon A3100 IS vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A3100 IS | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Canon | Olympus |
| Model type | Canon PowerShot A3100 IS | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-01-05 | 2012-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | TruePic VI |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-140mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.7-5.6 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 1,030 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 165 grams (0.36 lbs) | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 58 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 220 photographs |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NB-8L | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HD MMCplus | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $159 | $500 |