Canon A3100 IS vs Olympus TG-3
94 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
Canon A3100 IS vs Olympus TG-3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-140mm (F2.7-5.6) lens
- 165g - 97 x 58 x 28mm
- Released January 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced March 2014
- Successor is Olympus TG-4
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Canon A3100 IS vs Olympus TG-3 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Canon A3100 IS versus Olympus TG-3, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Canon and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the A3100 IS (12MP) and TG-3 (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe A3100 IS was unveiled 5 years earlier than the TG-3 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick view of how the A3100 IS scores against the TG-3 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Canon A3100 IS vs Olympus TG-3 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Canon PowerShot A3100 IS and Olympus Tough TG-3. The full galleries are viewable at Canon A3100 IS Gallery and Olympus TG-3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Canon A3100 IS over the Olympus TG-3
| A3100 IS | TG-3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Canon A3100 IS
| TG-3 | A3100 IS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2014 |  | January 2010 | More recent by 51 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Canon A3100 IS and Olympus TG-3
| A3100 IS | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Canon A3100 IS vs Olympus TG-3 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Canon A3100 IS features exterior measurements of 97mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs) while the Olympus TG-3 has measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Canon A3100 IS versus Olympus TG-3 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the A3100 IS vs the TG-3.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the A3100 IS and TG-3 is 94 and 90 respectively.
Canon A3100 IS vs Olympus TG-3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to imagine the difference in sensor measurements only by viewing a spec sheet. The visual here will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the A3100 IS and TG-3.
As you can see, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but different MP. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-3 to render more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images way more aggressively. The older A3100 IS will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Canon A3100 IS vs Olympus TG-3 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Canon A3100 IS vs Olympus TG-3 Specifications
| Canon PowerShot A3100 IS | Olympus Tough TG-3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Canon | Olympus |
| Model | Canon PowerShot A3100 IS | Olympus Tough TG-3 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-01-05 | 2014-03-31 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-140mm (4.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.7-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 3cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT-LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1600 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.00 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264, Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 165 grams (0.36 lbs) | 247 grams (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 97 x 58 x 28mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 330 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NB-8L | LI-92B |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 10, Custom, Face) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC/MMC/MMCplus/HD MMCplus | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $159 | $350 |